In the automotive industry, the line between mechanical nightmare and practical car is sometimes thinner than it seems. The Internet regularly publishes annual rankings of models to avoid. Indeed, while the purchase of a vehicle can be considered a real bargain, it’s often a journey strewn with pitfalls. Between depreciation, exorbitant maintenance costs and recurring technical problems, buying a quality vehicle can be a real headache. can be a real headache, usually leading to excessively high bills. Discover in this article the 20 cars no longer worth their new price in 2025.
A recent report by CSIS (the Center for Strategic and International Studies), reported by CNN, says that a stunning 1.2 million Russian troops have been killed in Ukraine since Russia invaded the country four years ago, a scale of losses that the researchers describe as unprecedented for a major military power since World War II. According to the analysis, the casualty rate reflects the intensity and duration of the conflict, with repeated large-scale offensives, entrenched front lines, and tactics that have resulted in sustained and exceptionally high human costs. CSIS notes that such losses are virtually without modern precedent for a state with Russia’s military size and resources, underscoring the depth of the war’s impact on Moscow’s armed forces and raising questions about the long-term sustainability of its campaign in Ukraine.
Getty Images
Data from the CSIS report highlight another striking imbalance in the war’s human cost, showing that Ukraine is estimated to have lost between 500,000 and 600,000 troops, while Russia’s death toll surpasses Ukraine’s by a ratio of roughly 2-to-1. The assessment underscores the scale of Russian losses relative to its battlefield gains and manpower strategy. According to comments cited from Britain’s deputy ambassador to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, James Ford, Russian military casualties, including those killed and wounded, now exceed the country’s sustainable recruitment and replacement rates. Analysts warn that this imbalance is not only straining Russia’s armed forces but is also beginning to weigh on the broader economy, as prolonged mobilization, labor shortages, and rising military expenditures place increasing pressure on domestic growth and long-term stability.
Getty Images
Over the past year, the conflict has entered a new phase shaped in part by Donald Trump’s return to the White House and his public framing of the war. Trump has repeatedly presented Russia as holding the upper hand, stressing Ukraine’s dependence on Western aid and casting doubt on Kyiv’s ability to sustain the fight. This narrative contrasts with assessments from Western analysts, including CSIS, which note that despite the scale of the war and massive losses, Russia has increased the amount of Ukrainian territory under its control by only about 12% since 2022. The limited territorial gains, measured against the human and economic cost of the conflict, have fueled debate among allies over how the war is being portrayed politically, particularly as evidence continues to point to heavy Russian casualties and growing strain on Moscow’s military and economy.
Donald Trump’s latest retribution attempt targets the Treasury Department and the US Internal Revenue Service, as he filed a lawsuit in Florida alongside two of his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, seeking at least $10 billion in damages. The complaint accuses the agencies of allowing an unauthorized leak of his tax returns during his first administration, an episode that has continued to fuel Trump’s claims of institutional misconduct. The legal action follows the sentencing of former IRS contractor Charles Littlejohn, who was sentenced to five years in prison in 2024 after admitting to disclosing thousands of tax returns without authorization, according to CNN.
Getty Images
Trump’s legal team accused the IRS in a statement of having « allowed a rogue, politically-motivated employee » to leak private and confidential information about Trump, the Trump Organization and members of his family. According to the statement, the disclosures were deliberately funneled to several left-wing media outlets, including the New York Time and ProPublica, which the lawsuit claims amplified the breach by publishing the material. The legal filing further alleges that these organizations « illegally released » Trump’s tax returns to « millions of people, » framing the episode as a coordinated violation of federal law and taxpayer privacy protections. The accusations are presented as central to Trump’s broader claim that federal institutions failed to prevent, and in effect enabled, the unlawful dissemination of sensitive financial records.
The IRS wrongly allowed a rogue, politically-motivated employee to leak private and confidential information about President Trump, his family, and the Trump Organization to the New York Times, ProPublica and other left-wing news outlets, which was then illegally released to millions of people. President Trump continues to hold those who wrong America and Americans accountable.
Trump was the first president in decades not to voluntarily release his full tax returns, breaking a long-standing tradition in US politics in which presidential candidates and sitting presidents routinely made their tax filings public as a basic transparency measure. The controversy intensified after a separate criminal case revealed how some of that information reached the media. According to US prosecutors, former IRS contractor Charles Littlejohn illegally accessed and disclosed Trump’s tax data while working for the agency, with the unauthorized transfers occurring in 2019 and 2020. Reporting based on the leaked material and later confirmed by the tax returns released by Congress shows that Trump paid just $750 in federal income taxes in 2016 and again in 2017, and no federal income tax at all in 2020. These figures became central to public scrutiny of Trump’s finances and tax practices, reinforcing claims that he used losses and deductions to dramatically reduce his tax liability in several years.
Getty Images
Since returning to the White House, Donald Trump has pursued a series of high-value legal actions seeking financial damages, largely against media and technology companies. In early 2025, he reached a settlement with Meta over social-media account suspensions, resulting in about $25 million, largely directed to his presidential library. In mid-2025, Trump filed a defamation lawsuit against ABC/Disney over televised comments, a case later settled for roughly $15 million, plus legal fees. In July 2025, he sued the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones over alleged defamatory reporting linked to Jeffrey Epstein, seeking $10 billion, with the case still pending. In September 2025, Trump brought a defamation suit against The New York Times and Penguin Random House, tied to investigative reporting and a related book, demanding $15 billion; the case was later dismissed with the option to refile. Later in 2025, Trump sued CBS and its parent company Paramount Global over edited footage aired on 60 Minutes, initially seeking $20 billion, before the dispute was settled for $16 million. He has also threatened legal action against the BBC, accusing the broadcaster of misleading editing in a documentary and warning of a potential lawsuit seeking $1 billion in damages, though no formal case has been filed to date.
Getty Images
Since returning to the White House, Donald Trump has continued to press financial claims against the US government tied to past federal investigations. In 2024, his lawyers filed administrative damage claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act seeking more than $100 million from the Department of Justice over the August 2022 FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, alleging misconduct and reputational harm. Those filings also included a broader compensation request totaling about $230 million, covering both the Mar-a-Lago search and the earlier Russia investigation. In 2025, Trump publicly confirmed those figures, saying the federal government «owes him a lot of money,» while acknowledging that any settlement would require approval from his own administration. The claims were formally submitted and reviewed by the Justice Department, but had not yet resulted in a court lawsuit at the time of his comments.
President Donald Trump is facing rare backlash from the National Rifle Association after his administration’s response to the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse killed by federal agents in Minneapolis.
Trump said Pretti «shouldn’t have been carrying a gun» and repeated that «you can’t have guns», despite video evidence showing Pretti never drew his legally owned firearm.
The NRA publicly rejected the administration’s narrative, defending the rights of lawful gun owners as officials escalated rhetoric portraying Pretti as a violent extremist. Trump’s comments, including «I don’t like that he had a gun», have deepened divisions within the gun-rights movement and intensified scrutiny of federal use of force.
Donald Trump drew fresh criticism after dismissing a frightening syringe attack on Minnesota congresswoman Ilhan Omar during a Minneapolis town hall. As Omar was speaking, a man rushed forward and sprayed her with what was initially described as an unknown liquid before being restrained by security. Despite video footage and witness accounts, Trump said he «haven’t seen it» and claimed that «she probably had herself sprayed», minimizing the incident. The suspect, later identified as 55-year-old Anthony James Kazmierczak, was arrested and charged with third-degree assault. Omar later said «I’m ok», vowing not to be intimidated as investigators consider federal charges.
European coastal states have formally accused Russia of escalating interference with maritime navigation systems, warning that satellite jamming and signal manipulation now pose a serious threat to safety at sea. In a joint letter to the International Maritime Community, 14 countries said disruptions originating from the Russian Federation are degrading GPS reliability in the Baltic and North Sea, increasing risks of collisions, groundings and delayed rescues for «all vessels». Governments also raised alarms over AIS spoofing and the growing presence of Russia-linked shadow fleet tankers. The warning follows years of rising GPS interference and investigations into severed subsea cables, underscoring mounting concern over Russia’s expanding hybrid activity in European waters.
Russia’s second-largest oil producer, Lukoil, has been heavily affected by U.S. sanctions imposed by the Trump administration, measures described by Washington as part of a broader effort to pressure Moscow into negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine. In that context, Lukoil announced that it has reached an initial agreement with the U.S. private equity firm Carlyle Group to sell a majority stake in its foreign assets. The move marks a significant shift for the Russian energy company as it seeks to offload overseas operations amid mounting financial and regulatory pressure, while allowing a U.S.-based firm to expand its footprint in global oil markets shaped by sanctions and geopolitical realignment.
Getty Images
Russia’s second-largest oil producer, Lukoil, has been heavily affected by U.S. sanctions imposed by the Trump administration, measures Washington said were aimed at forcing Moscow toward negotiations to end the war in Ukraine. When announcing the sanctions in October, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said, «Now is the time to stop the killing and for an immediate ceasefire», adding that «Given President Putin’s refusal to end this senseless war, Treasury is sanctioning Russia’s two largest oil companies that fund the Kremlin’s war machine». Against that backdrop, Lukoil announced it had reached an initial agreement with the U.S. private equity firm Carlyle Group to sell a majority stake in its foreign assets, a move reflecting the mounting financial pressure on Russia’s energy sector.
Getty Images
U.S. sanctions, combined with European measures and lower global oil prices, led to a 25 percent drop in Russia’s oil and gas exports last year, according to Russia’s finance ministry, as Washington and its allies intensified pressure by targeting tankers linked to Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet.” The Kremlin reacted cautiously to the reported deal between a U.S. firm and a Russian company, with a spokesperson saying «the main priority is that the interests of the Russian company are ensured and upheld». On the U.S. side, the transaction remains subject to approval by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, the Treasury Department agency responsible for enforcing and administering sanctions, underscoring the regulatory hurdles surrounding any transaction involving sanctioned Russian energy assets.
The second fatal shooting of a U.S. citizen by federal immigration enforcement agents in Minneapolis plunged the Trump administration into a widening political and operational crisis, sharply escalating scrutiny of Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota. The death of Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, marked the second deadly encounter involving federal agents in the state this month, triggering sustained protests, legal challenges, and demands from Minnesota officials that federal forces withdraw. State and local leaders accused Washington of inflaming tensions and failing to maintain control over a rapidly deteriorating situation, turning what began as an enforcement operation into a national flashpoint with mounting political consequences.
Getty Images
As the fallout intensified, an internal blame game erupted inside the administration over how the shooting was handled and publicly explained. White House officials privately accused Customs and Border Protection of circulating inaccurate and inflammatory intelligence, while others faulted senior adviser Stephen Miller for amplifying the claim that Pretti sought a «massacre», language later conceded by officials to be unsupported. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who repeated the allegation publicly, faced growing criticism from lawmakers and administration aides for failing to verify the information, deepening mistrust and fueling accusations of reckless messaging amid an already volatile situation.
Getty Images
Under mounting pressure, President Trump moved to reset the federal response by sidelining Border Patrol leadership overseeing the Minnesota operation and dispatching Tom Homan to take direct control. The reassignment effectively removed the commander on the ground as Homan, the administration’s so-called border czar, assumed authority. Homan vowed to remain in Minnesota until «I’m staying ‘til the problem is gone», signaling an attempt to stabilize the operation, contain political damage, and reassert control. The leadership shake-up underscored the severity of the crisis and growing demands for accountability and clearer oversight.
Getty Images
At his first press conference in Minnesota since taking charge of the federal immigration operation, border czar Tom Homan said the enforcement mission «has not been perfect» and stressed that his priority is to make it «safer» and «more efficient». He reaffirmed his vow to remain in the state, declaring «I’m staying ’til the problem is gone», while confirming that discussions are underway with Minnesota officials about reducing the federal presence if cooperation improves. Homan said ICE would continue targeted enforcement «by the book» and declined to address the specific shootings, arguing that ongoing investigations must proceed before conclusions are drawn.
Donald Trump’s long-running hostility toward Minnesota congresswoman Ilhan Omar showed no sign of easing after she was targeted in a frightening syringe attack while speaking at a town hall event in Minneapolis. At the moment of the incident, a visibly disturbed man rushed toward Omar and sprayed her with what was described at the time as an unknown liquid before being quickly restrained by security. Asked by reporters whether he had seen video of the attack, Trump said he «haven’t seen it», before dismissing the episode by adding that «she probably had herself sprayed», remarks that drew immediate criticism for minimizing the seriousness of the assault as details were still emerging.
Getty Images
In the widely shared video of the altercation at the Minneapolis town hall, a man seated in the front row suddenly confronts Representative Ilhan Omar as she speaks about Immigration and Customs Enforcement and calls for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to «resign or face impeachment» following recent controversial federal actions. As Omar addresses the audience, the man — later identified by police as 55-year-old Anthony James Kazmierczak — stands up, appears to shout toward her, and then sprays her with the contents of a syringe. Witnesses described the substance at the time as having a strong, acidic smell before security officers quickly tackled and restrained him.
Getty Images
Bystanders captured the incident on video and can be heard warning Omar that the liquid smelled bad and urging her to seek medical evaluation, a suggestion she immediately dismissed during the event. Authorities later identified the substance inside the syringe as apple cider vinegar, according to CNN. Omar addressed the incident shortly afterward on social media, writing that «I’m ok. I’m a survivor so this small agitator isn’t going to intimidate me from doing my work. I don’t let bullies win», emphasizing her determination to continue her political work despite the attack and the disruption caused by the confrontation.
Getty Images
Donald Trump, who for years has repeatedly and harshly attacked Representative Ilhan Omar, again dismissed the seriousness of the incident after she was assaulted at a town hall in Minneapolis. Trump has previously led chants of «Send her back» to Somalia, where Omar was born and suggested without evidence that she married her brother, among other things. Asked about the syringe attack, Trump said «I haven’t seen» the video and added «I hope I don’t have to bother», before asserting that «knowing her» she «probably had herself sprayed», accusing Omar of being «a fraud», according to ABC News. The man who attacked her was arrested at the scene, booked on third-degree assault, and is being held at the Hennepin County Jail, while Capitol Police are pursuing potential federal charges related to the attack on the Democratic lawmaker.
President Donald Trump is facing unaccustomed backlash from the National Rifle Association (NRA) after his administration’s response to the fatal shooting of 37-year-old ICU nurse Alex Pretti by federal agents in Minneapolis. In the aftermath, Trump suggested that Pretti «shouldn’t have been carrying a gun» and stated that «you can’t have guns» in that context, even though Pretti was a lawful concealed-carry permit holder and video evidence does not show him drawing or threatening officers before being shot. The NRA has sharply rebuked federal officials’ comments as “dangerous and wrong,” defending the Second Amendment rights of lawful gun owners and urging a full investigation into the incident, as broader debate grows over gun rights and law enforcement use of force under the Trump administration.
Getty Images
The National Rifle Association publicly broke with the Trump administration’s narrative, writing on X that «The NRA unequivocally believes that all law-abiding citizens have a right to keep and bear arms anywhere they have a legal right to be.» The statement came as the administration intensified efforts to characterize Alex Pretti as a violent extremist, with officials pushing to frame him as a “domestic terrorist” despite video evidence showing he never drew his weapon. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel echoed that stance, asserting that «No one who wants to be peaceful shows up at a protest with a firearm that is loaded with two full magazines.» White House adviser Stephen Miller went further, claiming that «Pretti came to ‘massacre’ cops», language that has sharply escalated criticism over the administration’s handling of the case.
Getty Images
The NRA’s statement came the same day Donald Trump doubled down on his remarks about the shooting, describing it as a «very unfortunate incident» but insisting, «You know, you can’t have guns. You can’t walk in with guns. You just can’t.» Trump later added, «I don’t like that he had a gun.» and «I don’t like that he had two fully loaded magazines.», comments that prompted criticism from other gun-rights organizations. The National Association for Gun Rights responded on X, stating, «Carrying an extra magazine implies nothing.» and adding that «Thousands of law-abiding Americans do this every day. This is standard, not overkill.» The group concluded by warning, «Claiming otherwise sets a dangerous precedent for Second Amendment rights and creates an easy backdoor argument for magazine bans and similar legislation.»
