Catégories
Uncategorized

Trump, MAGA US Players Ridicule Women’s Hockey Team

The celebration of the U.S. men’s hockey team’s Olympic gold medal quickly turned controversial after FBI Director Kash Patel appeared alongside the players during locker room festivities and helped facilitate a congratulatory phone call from President Donald Trump. Videos circulating online showed Patel celebrating with the team before the president was patched through on speakerphone. What began as a triumphant moment marking the United States’ first men’s Olympic hockey gold medal in decades soon shifted into a political spectacle. The call, captured on video, drew immediate scrutiny not only for the involvement of a top federal official in the celebration, but for what Trump said next about the U.S. women’s hockey team, who had also secured gold days earlier.

Getty Images

During the call, Trump congratulated the men on their victory and extended a high-profile invitation. «I just told my people … I said, we’re giving the State of the Union speech Tuesday night … if you would like to, it’s the coolest night,» Trump said, extending an invitation to the team. «We’re in!» some of the hockey players can be heard saying.

«Thank you, Mr President,» another shouted. The mood in the room was celebratory and loud, with players cheering and laughing as the president continued speaking. The invitation positioned the athletes as honored guests at a major political address, further intertwining their Olympic triumph with a partisan setting.

«I do believe that I would probably be impeached.»

-President, Donald Trump

The tone shifted when Trump referenced the women’s hockey team, who had won their own Olympic gold medal just days before. «What would really be cool, and we’ll do the White House next time, we’ll just have some fun, we have medals for you guys.

And we have to, I must tell you, we’re gonna have to bring the women’s team, you do know that?» Trump said, laughing, as the players joined in. «I do believe that I would probably be impeached,» Trump said.

Laughter is clearly audible in the video at that moment, amplifying criticism that the women’s victory was being treated as a punchline rather than an equal achievement.

Getty Images

The reaction online was swift and intense. Critics argued that the remarks and the laughter diminished the accomplishments of the women’s team, who had defeated Canada in a tightly contested final to claim gold. The clip spread rapidly across social media platforms, where commentators accused Trump and the players of disrespecting female athletes.

Supporters countered that the comment was a joke taken out of context, but the optics of the moment — particularly the shared laughter — fueled debate about gender equity in sports and the politicization of Olympic victories. The controversy overshadowed what had been a historic moment for U.S. hockey.

Getty Images

Soon after, USA Hockey confirmed that the women’s team would not attend the State of the Union address. In a statement, a spokesperson said, «Due to the timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments following the Games, the athletes are unable to participate.»

The statement continued, «We are sincerely grateful for the invitation extended to our gold medal–winning U.S. Women’s Hockey Team and deeply appreciate the recognition of their extraordinary achievement». The language was measured and diplomatic, yet it reinforced the distance between the athletes and the political moment unfolding around them.

«What would really be cool, and we’ll do the White House next time, we’ll just have some fun, we have medals for you guys. And we have to, I must tell you, we’re gonna have to bring the women’s team, you do know that?»

-President, Donald Trump

The backlash extended beyond political circles. Rapper Flavor Flav publicly offered an alternative celebration for the women’s champions, writing, «If the USA Women’s Hockey team wants a real celebration and invite, I’ll host them in Las Vegas.

Do some nice dinners and shows and good times. I’m sure I can get a hotel and airline to help me out here and celebrate these women for real for real.» Several brands quickly signaled support for the idea, including StubHub, Alaska Air, Resorts World Las Vegas, Ramsay’s Kitchen, Beis and the Palms Casino Resort, according to The Daily Beast.

The episode ultimately highlighted how a moment intended to celebrate Olympic achievement instead sparked debate over whether the women’s gold medal was treated with the same respect and seriousness as that of their male counterparts.

Getty Images

2-time WNBA champ Kara Braxton dead at 43

The year 2026 was marked by the passing of many personalities who left a lasting mark on our society. Artists, creators, public figures, thinkers, and athletes—each and every one contributed in their own way to shaping our era and our collective imagination. This In Memoriam project pays tribute to those who left us during the year. Through these memories, we take a moment to remember their influence, celebrate their contributions, and honor lives that will continue to resonate long after their passing.

No «tangible signs» Russia «seriously» wants peace

The European Union says it still sees no real indication that Russia is ready to end the war in Ukraine, despite five days of US-brokered peace talks held in Geneva. European Commission spokesperson Anouar El Anouni warned that «Nothing can be decided about Ukraine without Europe at the negotiating table» and added that the bloc does not see «tangible signs» Moscow is «engaging seriously on peace.» The talks, involving Ukrainian and Russian delegations alongside US mediation, followed earlier negotiations in Abu Dhabi that produced a prisoner swap. But as leaders assess the latest round, frustration is growing in Brussels, where officials fear diplomacy is stalling while attacks continue.

Mexico Erupts in Violence After The Killing of Cartel Boss

Mexico is facing renewed instability after the death of cartel leader El Mencho triggered a wave of coordinated violence across several states, raising concerns about security, succession struggles and the resilience of organized crime networks. Road blockades, arson attacks and armed confrontations disrupted daily life and stranded travelers as federal forces moved to restore order. While Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has sought to reassure the public, analysts warn that the cartel’s rapid retaliation highlights its operational depth and capacity to destabilize entire regions. The uncertainty surrounding leadership within the organization now threatens to prolong tensions in an already fragile security environment.

Catégories
Uncategorized

5,5M$ pour renommer un aéroport au nom de Trump

Donald Trump a décidé de satisfaire une nouvelle fois son ego après avoir réussi à faire renommer l’aéroport de Palm Beach « Donald J. Trump International Airport ». Palm Beach International, situé à seulement huit kilomètres du célèbre terrain de golf Mar-A-Lago de Trump, où il se rend chaque semaine pour jouer au golf et organiser des fêtes kitsch pour ses donateurs millionnaires. Le changement de nom a été approuvé à une large majorité par la Chambre des représentants de Floride, contrôlée par le Parti républicain, avec 81 voix pour et 30 contre. Selon le département des aéroports du comté de Palm Beach, le changement de nom coûtera plus de 5 millions de dollars.

Les démocrates s’affrontent à la Chambre des représentants

Si les représentants de la Chambre de Floride ont voté à une nette majorité, l’opinion au sein de la Chambre était beaucoup plus divisée que ne le laisse supposer le résultat final. Les représentants démocrates de Floride se sont battus bec et ongles pour s’opposer au changement de nom, mais leurs protestations ont été vaines. Dès que Donald Trump a annoncé son souhait de renommer l’aéroport, les sénateurs républicains se sont bousculés pour crier leur approbation du président. Les changements de nom sans conséquence sont le genre de comportement pro-Trump que les politiciens du MAGA-verse saisiront à chaque occasion pour montrer leur soutien au leader intrépide de l’Amérique.

La chef de la minorité à la Chambre des représentants de Floride, Fentrice Driskell, a qualifié le changement de nom d’escroquerie, même si Trump affirme que sa famille ne recevra aucune compensation financière pour ce changement. Les législateurs républicains ont salué cette initiative, citant la réputation exceptionnelle de Trump et son impact positif sur Palm Beach. Selon le représentant républicain John Snyder, Trump a fait de Palm Beach l’un des endroits les plus prisés et les plus importants au monde, et Mar-a-Lago est un symbole du pouvoir des États-Unis. Snyder a également qualifié le terrain de golf de « Maison-Blanche d’hiver », ce qui soulève des questions sur la fusion entre les fonctions gouvernementales et la propriété privée. Le changement de nom soulève également des questions sur l’intersection entre les infrastructures publiques et la propriété de marques privées, car c’est la société LLC de Donald Trump qui a initialement fait pression sur le Congrès pour renommer l’aéroport.

Un autre bâtiment Trump ?

En décembre 2025, Donald Trump a ajouté son nom au légendaire Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, le rebaptisant Donald Trump – John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts (très subtil). Après avoir littéralement apposé son nom sur le Kennedy Center en décembre 2025, le président avait clairement besoin d’un autre monument à sa gloire, cette fois-ci à deux pas de son autre domicile. S’il est clair que Trump veut voir son nom sur chaque bâtiment qu’il croise, ces demandes de changement de nom ne sont pas gratuites, et même si le camp Trump ne tirerait aucun profit de ce changement, il ne paie pas non plus les frais logistiques que cela implique.

Le coût d’un ego

On ne sait pas exactement combien le changement de nom du Kennedy Center par Trump a coûté aux contribuables – ce changement de nom faisait partie d’une rénovation plus importante qui a coûté environ 250 millions de dollars au Congrès. Le budget de 250 millions de dollars a été utilisé en partie pour le changement de nom. La salle de bal à la Gatsby de Donald Trump, pour laquelle il a détruit la moitié de la Maison Blanche, coûtera environ 400 millions de dollars. Trump continue d’affirmer que la salle de bal sera entièrement financée par des donateurs privés et ce qu’il appelle les « grandes entreprises américaines », mais comme une grande partie du financement est encore incertaine et que la conception finale de la salle de bal n’a été approuvée que le 20 janvier, le chiffre de 400 millions de dollars avancé par Trump semble de plus en plus douteux.

Avec les centaines de millions de dollars déjà dépensés pour satisfaire l’ego de Trump, qu’est-ce que 5,5 millions de dollars de plus ? Selon le département des aéroports du comté de Palm Beach, c’est ce que coûtera le changement de nom : 5,5 millions de dollars. Les coûts comprendront les changements logistiques tels que la refonte des panneaux, des uniformes, des produits promotionnels et des équipements, ainsi que les coûts annexes liés au marketing et à la formation. La société holding de Trump, DTTM Operations LLC, a également déposé des brevets sur les noms « President Donald J. Trump International Airport », « Donald J. Trump International Airport » et « DJT », ce dernier étant très probablement le code aéroportuaire que Trump espère voir Palm Beach International (actuellement PBI) adopter une fois que le nouveau nom sera en place.

Palm Beach (non) consentante

Étonnamment, alors que la Chambre des représentants de Floride a déjà voté et adopté le projet de loi, la Commission du comté de Palm Beach n’a pas encore eu l’occasion de se prononcer sur le changement de nom de son aéroport. Alors que les législateurs républicains convainquent le public que Palm Beach a une dette envers Donald Trump, la ville n’a pas voté pour lui en 2024. Donald Trump a perdu le comté de Palm Beach au profit de Kamala Harris par moins de 500 voix en 2024. Le comté de Palm Beach est depuis longtemps un bastion démocrate, et la victoire serrée de Harris en 2024 a été la plus faible victoire démocrate en plus de 20 ans. Les relations de Trump avec Palm Beach ont entraîné un afflux constant de conservateurs à hauts revenus dans le comté, mais Trump ne bénéficie toujours pas d’un soutien majoritaire dans le comté.

Catégories
Uncategorized

Trump costs Airport more than $5.5M in egomaniacal renaming bid

Donald Trump has decided to satisfy his ego once again after succeeding in a bid to rename Palm Beach Airport ‘Donald J. Trump International Airport’. Palm Beach International, which sits just five miles from Trump’s infamous Mar-A-Lago golf course, where he visits every week to play golf and host tacky parties for his millionaire donors. The name change was passed with sweeping approval through the GOP-run Florida House, with representatives voting 81-30 in favour of renaming the airport. According to Palm Beach County’s department of airports, the name change will cost more than $5mn to implement.

Democrats scrap on the House floor

While Florida House representatives voted in a clear majority, the sense on the House floor was significantly more divided than the total count implies. Democratic representatives from Florida fought tooth and nail to deny the name change, but their cries were in vain. As soon as Donald Trump announced his wish for the renaming, Republican senators trampled over each other to shout their approval of the President. Nonconsequential name changes are the kind of pro-Trump behaviour MAGA-verse politicians will take every opportunity to support in order to show their support for America’s fearless leader.

Florida House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell called the name change a grift, even if Trump claims his family will receive no financial compensation for the name change. GOP lawmakers lauded the move, citing Trump’s stellar reputation and his positive impact on Palm Beach. According to GOP state Rep. John Snyder, Trump has turned Palm Beach into one of the most desirable and important locations in the world, and Mar-a-Lago is a symbol of power for the United States. Snyder also called the golf course the ‘winter White House, ’ leading to questions about the merging of government office and personal property. The renaming also raises questions about the intersection of public infrastructure and private brand ownership, as it was Donald Trump’s LLC that originally lobbied Congress to rename the airport.

Another Trump building?

In December 2025, Donald Trump added his name to the legendary Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, renaming it the Donald Trump – John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts (very subtle). After Trump quite literally slapped his name on the Kennedy Center in December 2025, the President clearly needed another monument to his greatness – this time around the corner from his other home. While it’s clear that Trump wants to see his name on every building he passes, these re-naming bids are not free, and while Trump’s camp reportedly won’t see any profit from the renaming, it’s also not paying for the logistical costs the renaming includes.

The cost of an ego

It’s unclear how much Trump’s renaming of the Kennedy Center cost taxpayers – the renaming was part of a larger renovation that cost roughly $250 million in Congressional funding. The $250 budget was used in part for the renaming. Donald Trump’s Gatsby-esque ballroom, which he destroyed half of the White House to build, will cost an estimated $400 million. While Trump continues to claim that the ballroom will be funded entirely by private donors and what he calls ‘Great American Companies,’; but with much of the funding still in the air, and the final design for the ballroom only just being approved on January 20th, Trump’s $400 million figure seems more dubious by the day.

With hundreds of millions of dollars already being spent to satisfy Trump’s ego, what’s another $5.5 million? According to Palm Beach County’s department of airports, that’s what the name change will cost to implement: $5.5 million. The costs will include logistical changes such as remaking signs, uniforms, promotional products, and equipment, as will as ancillary costs related to marketing and training. Trump’s holding company, DTTM Operations LLC, also filed patents on the names “President Donald J. Trump International Airport,” “Donald J. Trump International Airport,” and “DJT,” the latter most likely being the airport code Trump hopes Palm Beach International (currently PBI) will switch to once the new name is in place.

An (un)consenting Palm Beach

Surprisingly, while Florida’s House has already voted and passed the bill, the Palm Beach County Commission has not had the chance to weigh in on the effort to rename its airport. While republican lawmakers convince the public that Palm Beach is in debt to Donald Trump, the city did not vote for him in 2024. Donald Trump lost Palm Beach County to Kamala Harris by less than 500 votes in 2024. Palm Beach County has long been a Democratic stronghold, and the Harris’s narrow victory in 2024 was the slimmest democratic win in more than 20 years. Trump’s relationship with Palm Beach has resulted in the county’s demographic seeing a steady flow of high-income conservatives, but Trump still lacks majority support in the county.

Catégories
Uncategorized

New in-depth poll shows the scale of voters displeasure with Donald Trump

A new poll released by YouGov/The Economist revealed statistics on American voters’ opinions of Donald Trump, his actions as President, and a wide range of politicians across the aisle. Unsurprisingly, the polls didn’t reveal anything favourable about Trump. The documents included data on his handling of the Epstein files, ICE agents in Minnesota, foreign relations, and everything in between. The poll also included a list of terms describing Donald Trump and asked voters how strongly they associate the term with Trump. There were only a handful of words that voters strongly agreed Trump personified, including racist, dangerous, corrupt, and cruel. The poll sampled 1,674 Americans and mimicked a scaled, but accurate, demographic makeup of the United States.

Breaking down the votes

The first section on Donald Trump calculated his job approval and his handling of a slew of issues. Included were crime, race relations, immigration, and the environment. Trump scored an impressively poor score in his job approval, with an impressive 56% disapproval rate, and an approval rating below 40%. Trump was closer on crime, but still 47% disapproved of his handling and 43% approved. Immigration was a tougher loss for Trump, with 53% of voters disagreeing, and his handling of race relations scored even worse, with only 34% of polled Americans believing he has done a good job. His score on the environment was no better, with 52% disapproving and 35% approving of his handling of environmental issues.

Up next, voters were tasked with deciding on Trump’s ideology. 57% of voters believe he is a ‘total conservative’, and he got another win in the sincerity column, with an impressive 53% of polled voters thinking that Trump believes what he says. Trump’s faithful showed in the next question, where 29% of voters said they liked him as a person, but 44% saying they ‘disliked him a lot’. Possibly the most telling statistic came from question 19. Voters were asked to poll how strongly they agreed with the statement ‘Trump cares about people like you’. A whopping 47% said they believed the president doesn’t care about them ‘ at all.’

Associated words

In the next section, voters were tasked with connecting terms to Donald Trump and judging how accurately they describe the President. The list of words included honest, intelligent, inspiring, bold, effective, steady, racist, dangerous, corrupt, divisive, cruel, strong, and out of touch. With six positive terms and six negative terms, voters were given an opportunity to praise and criticize the President. Trump did poorly in the honesty section, with just 20% of voters deeming him honest, and he fared no better in ‘inspiring’, with just 18% Americans feeling inspired by the President.

Trump will be glad to know that 43% of Americans describe him as bold, and it’s a safe bet that the real number is higher.

Opinions were split into thirds on whether or not Trump is effective, and voters were stumped on whether or not he’s ‘steady’. Voters were not stumped on whether or not they think Donald Trump is a racist, though. An impressive 47% of Americans would describe Donald Trump as racist, and only 24% believe the word racist does not describe the President. Out of the remaining six terms (dangerous, corrupt, divisive, cruel, strong, and out of touch), only three of them ended with decisive data. Unsurprisingly, they weren’t a positive trio.

Dangerous, corrupt, and cruel

The three categories with the clearest answers were all negative toward Trump. Fifty percent of Americans believe Donald Trump is dangerous. Another 49% believe him to be corrupt, and 46% of voters believe Donald Trump is cruel. Dangerous, racist, corrupt, and cruel.

These are the four words that America has chosen to describe its President, and he’s done his best to exemplify those values over his tenure in the Oval Office. The rest of the poll was also critical of Trump, showcasing Americans’ displeasure with ICE action in Minnesota, and his handling of the Epstein files.

Fifty-seven percent of the population disapproves of his handling of the Epstein files, and another 53% believe Trump is hiding something.

Not fresh news

While we act like this is fresh data, YouGov and The Economist release this poll every year. This is the second year in a row that the general questions on Trump have remained unchanged. The media is writing articles about this poll as if it’s fresh news, but in reality, nearly all the statistics from 2025 are identical to those from 2024. Americans have held these beliefs for at least a full year, so when are they going to do something about it?

Actor Robert Carradine dead at 71

The year 2026 was marked by the passing of many personalities who left a lasting mark on our society. Artists, creators, public figures, thinkers, and athletes—each and every one contributed in their own way to shaping our era and our collective imagination. This In Memoriam project pays tribute to those who left us during the year. Through these memories, we take a moment to remember their influence, celebrate their contributions, and honor lives that will continue to resonate long after their passing.

Catégories
Uncategorized

Newsom Eyes 2028 Run, Frames Possible Harris Rivalry as «fate»

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is openly contemplating a 2028 presidential campaign, acknowledging in an exclusive interview with CNN’s Dana Bash that his political future could intersect with that of former Vice President Kamala Harris. Speaking during the nationally televised exchange, Newsom did not dismiss the possibility of facing Harris in a Democratic primary, instead casting such a scenario as beyond his control.

Asked what would happen if their «parallel careers intersect and collide,» Newsom replied, «Well, I’m San Francisco now, she’s LA. So there’s a little distance between the two of us. You know, fate will determine that.» The remark immediately fueled speculation about a high-profile California rivalry on the national stage.

Getty Images

Pressed further by Bash about a direct presidential contest against Harris, Newsom reiterated that he sees the matter as circumstantial rather than strategic.

«Yeah I just – that’s fate. I don’t – you know, you can only control what you can control,» he said, emphasizing that he has never tried to obstruct Harris’ political ambitions.

«I’ve never gotten in the way of her ambition, ever. I haven’t. And I don’t imagine I would in the future.»

The comments reflect careful positioning as both figures weigh their options in a party still recalibrating after the 2024 election cycle and looking ahead to a potentially crowded 2028 field.

«If I listened to polls I would have not run for my first office, or my second office — and I certainly wouldn’t be sitting here.»

-Former Vice President, Kamala Harris

Harris, meanwhile, has left little doubt that she remains engaged in national politics. In recent interviews, including a BBC appearance following the end of her vice presidency, she declined to rule out another presidential bid.

«I haven’t decided. Sincerely. I have not decided. I may or I may not. I have not decided,» she said when asked directly about 2028. At the same time, she signaled continued political resolve, declaring, «I am not done.» Harris has framed her career as one rooted in public service, adding, «I have lived my entire career as a life of service and it’s in my bones.»

Those statements have reinforced perceptions that a third run remains plausible.

Getty Images

Early Democratic polling has reflected that possibility. Surveys conducted in the months following the 2024 election have placed Harris near the top of potential primary contenders, in some cases ahead of Newsom.

Although polling at this stage is highly fluid, the numbers suggest that Harris retains significant name recognition and party support despite her previous defeat. She has also dismissed the idea that surveys dictate her political decisions, remarking, «If I listened to polls I would have not run for my first office, or my second office — and I certainly wouldn’t be sitting here.» The comment underscores her long-standing argument that electoral viability cannot be measured solely by early snapshots.

Getty Images

The dynamic between Harris and Newsom carries added weight because of their shared political roots in California. Both rose through San Francisco politics before ascending to statewide and national prominence. Harris served as district attorney in San Francisco before becoming California attorney general, U.S. senator and vice president. Newsom was mayor of San Francisco prior to becoming lieutenant governor and then governor. Their careers have occasionally overlapped in cooperative and competitive ways, including Harris’ account in her memoir of reaching out to Newsom during the 2024 campaign. The possibility of a primary contest would bring that long-running California narrative onto a national stage.

«Well, I’m San Francisco now, she’s LA. So there’s a little distance between the two of us. You know, fate will determine that.»

-California Gov. Gavin Newsom

Despite the mounting speculation, Newsom has stopped short of formally declaring his candidacy. In the CNN interview, he stressed that any decision would be made in consultation with his family. Recalling a text from his son reacting to headlines about a potential run, Newsom said, «My son … it was very powerful, texted me a few months ago when there was some headline that suggested that I made some decision, and he goes, ‘Dad, are you running (for) president?’» Newsom said he told him the choice would be collective.

For now, he insists no final decision has been made, leaving the prospect of a Newsom-Harris showdown in 2028 — as he repeatedly put it — to «fate.»

Getty Images

15 of the Coolest Vehicles Driven by Fictional Characters

Iconic fictional characters often achieve this status through daring feats, unique powers, and the use of fantastical objects that elicit wonder in the audience. Some of the most memorable fictional characters even have their own signature vehicle to help complete tasks. From Scooby Doo’s Mystery Machine to Master Chief’s Warthog, there is no shortage of awesome rides on digital roads.Regardless of which era you grew up in, there are bound to be some fictional vehicles that stand out in your mind. Join us as we reminisce about the top 15 signature cars driven by fictional characters throughout all of media.