Categories
Mobile Syrup

Twitter’s mobile apps won’t open links in AMP anymore

Twitter dropped support for Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) on mobile, according to a support page from the company.

Spotted by SEO consultant Christian Oliveira (via The Verge), the support page originally explained how Twitter would automatically send mobile users to the AMP version of a webpage through links posted on the platform. The page was updated at some point between October 21st and now with a notice that the company will retire the feature by the end of the year.

However, The Verge cites data from SearchEngineLand that shows Twitter’s AMP retirement likely wrapped up earlier this month. Now, visiting a webpage from Twitter on mobile appears to send users to the regular webpage instead of the AMP version.

For those unfamiliar with AMP, it’s a somewhat controversial technology introduced by Google back in 2015. Google’s goal with AMP was to make the mobile web faster. However, many people disliked AMP because of Google’s perceived control of the project and claimed it was an attempt by the search giant to further control the open web.

For example, there was a time when Google required news sites to offer AMP versions of their sites if they wanted to feature in the search engine’s ‘Top Stories’ section. However, Google dropped that requirement in May 2020.

People also had issues with how AMP worked, such as how AMP operated on Google’s servers rather than on the actual website people wanted to go to, or how AMP sites wouldn’t respect some settings like a users’ log-in status. In other cases, developers would make AMP versions of their site but would cut features and/or functionality, making the AMP variant significantly worse than the regular site.

Twitter’s support document doesn’t list a reason for the policy change, but for some users, it will likely be a welcome one. AMP is a regular pain in my ass since I mostly use Twitter as a news aggregation platform, so I’m happy about the change. And anyone who uses any of the plethora of browser extensions or apps designed to redirect AMP pages to the original URL will also likely welcome Twitter’s new policy.

Source: Twitter, Christian Oliveira, SearchEngineLand Via: The Verge

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Google’s smart home products get the Black Friday treatment

Google’s online store ‘Black Friday’ deals and promotions are live now, with great discounts on several of the company’s smart home gadgets and Pixelbooks.

It’s worth noting that all deals mentioned on Google’s website are also available at Best Buy, allowing a more convenient and familiar checkout.

Find all Black Friday deals from Google below, with an accompanied link to redirect to Best Buy:

Nest Doorbell (battery): $169.99 (regularly $239.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Cam (battery): $199.99 (regularly $239.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Cam 2-pack: $379.99 (regularly $439.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Learning Thermostat: $249 (regularly $329) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Cam with floodlight (wired): $319.99 (regularly $379.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Hub (2nd gen): $69.99 (regularly $129.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Wifi router: $199 (regularly $229) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Wifi router and point: $269 (regularly $349) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Wifi router and 2 points: $359 (regularly $459) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Audio: $79.99 (regularly $129.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Hub Max: $199.99 (regularly $299) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Thermostat: $129.99 (regularly $179.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Doorbell (wired): $199 (regularly $299) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Chromecast: $29.99 (regularly $39.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Google Wifi three-pack: $199.99 (regularly $279.99) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Nest Mini: $29 (regularly $69) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Pixelbook Go with Intel Core m3, 8GB RAM, 64GB storage: $809 (regularly $879) — Available cheaper ($799) at Best Buy

Pixelbook Go with Intel i5, 8GB RAM, 128GB storage: $999 (regularly $1,149) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Pixelbook Go with Intel i5, 16GB RAM, 128GB storage: $1,199 (regularly $1,349) — Available at Best Buy for the same price

Google’s Black Friday promotions are set to end on October 2nd.

MobileSyrup utilizes affiliate partnerships. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content, though MobileSyrup may earn a commission on purchases made via these links

Image credit: Google

Source: Google

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Finally, Google is redesigning the Play Store website

Finally! Google is reportedly redesigning the web version of the Play Store, a change that’s been a long time coming.

Android Police reports that the redesign is part of a server-side switch and isn’t widely available yet. Some people have had luck changing their Play Store to a different location (Korea and Taiwan reportedly work, although I couldn’t replicate it myself).

Regardless, Google redesigned Play Store goes from the old look (from the early days of Material Design) to what appears to be the current Play Store design blown up for larger displays. It generally looks good, although it really does look like the mobile Play Store stretched out for big screens on individual app pages.

Beyond that, there’s not a lot to say about the new Play Store design beyond that it’s modern, for better and worse. There’s now a navigation bar along the top for switching between apps and games. The Google account switcher in the top-right corner now hides a menu with access to subscriptions, order history and more.

The Games page features auto-playing trailers, there are scrollable screenshot galleries and more. Unfortunately, some aspects of the new design don’t work, likely due to the Play Store redesign being a work-in-progress still.

While I’m certainly excited for a refreshed Play Store website, I’m not sure how significant of a change it’ll be. I really only use the Play Store site to grab links to apps and games when I want to include them in stories I write for MobileSyrup — which, frankly, happens a lot.

In other words, your average user might not spend much time messing around with Play Store on the web. Regardless, the updated design is a move in the right direction and should further help unify Google’s web products.

Source: Android Police

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Google’s 2nd-gen Nest Hub smart display is roughly 50 percent off at Best Buy

If you want a smart display and you’re already part of Google’s smart home ecosystem, this deal on the 2nd-gen Nest Hub is pretty unbeatable.

The display is down to just $69.99 at Best Buy in Canada, which is $60 off its usual $120 price tag. If you want to learn more about the pretty excellent smart display that also includes sleep tracking features, check out MobileSyrup managing editor Patrick O’Rourke’s review of the Nest Hub (2021).

You can buy the 2nd-gen Nest Hub from Best Buy for $69.99 here.

MobileSyrup utilizes affiliate partnerships. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content, though MobileSyrup may earn a commission on purchases made via these links. 

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Google confirms the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro charge at 21W, 23W respectively

Google has published a blog post detailing how the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro charge and why the smartphones charge that way.

The post seems to be primarily a response to reports that the Pixel 6 series doesn’t have the 30W charging capability Google advertised (the initial report came from Android Authority early in November). However, before we dig too further into it, it’s worth noting Google didn’t actually say the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro had 30W wired charging.

There seem to be two main problems at play here. The first is that the Pixel 6 series doesn’t charge at 30W. The second is that the Pixel phones don’t charge as fast as Google claims. Neither of these problems are true, however, and the outcry seems a bit overblown with that in mind. I also want to be clear that I’m not defending Google — in fact, I think Google’s poor communication is largely to blame for all this — nor am I detracting from Android Authority’s excellent report that breaks down how the Pixel 6 charging works and how fast it actually is.

With all that said, let’s break down what’s going on with the Pixel 6 charging.

What Google claimed

The whole issue appears to stem from a Google support document that details the hardware specifications for the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro. The chart says the following about charging:

“Fast charging: Up to 50 percent charge in 30 minutes with Google 30W USB-C. Charger with USB-PD 3.0 (PPS) sold separately.”

At first glance, it certainly appears that the support document says the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro support 30W charging, but that text-only mentions using Google’s 30W charger and doesn’t say anything about the phone’s charging capabilities. Further, the support doc points to the following fine print:

“9. Fast wired charging rates are based upon use of the Google 30W USB-C Charger plugged into a wall outlet. Compatible with USB PD 3.0 PPS adapters. Actual results may be slower. Adapters sold separately. Charging speed based upon testing with device batteries drained to 1 percent and charged with Google 30W USB-C Charger, sold separately. Charging testing conducted by Google in mid-2021 on pre-production hardware and software using default settings with the device powered on. Charging speed depends upon many factors including usage during charging, battery age, and ambient temperature. Actual charging speed may be slower.
10. Wireless charging rates up to 21W (Pixel 6) and up to 23W (Pixel 6 Pro) charging with Google Pixel Stand (2nd gen), sold separately. Up to 12W with Qi-certified EPP chargers, sold separately. Actual results may be slower.”

Again, there’s no mention of the Pixel 6 or 6 Pro’s actual wired charging speed. The text only details measuring charging speed with Google’s 30W charger. Admittedly, it’s really confusing and absolutely misleading. The way Google described this makes it sound like the Pixel 6 series has 30W charging even though it doesn’t. Frankly, that’s unacceptable, but to me it seems that’s been skipped over to focus on the charging speed itself.

How fast the Pixel 6 Pro charges

Android Authority’s charging tests revealed that the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro charged at a maximum output of 22W when using Google’s 30W adapter. Additionally, the publication found in its testing that the Pixel 6 Pro maintains that level of charging until about 50 percent, then reduces the charging speed significantly.

The time to charge from zero to 50 percent was 31 minutes, as measured by Android Authority. That’s only a minute longer than what Google officially claimed.

However, Android Authority measured that after reaching 62 percent charge, the phone reduced the amount of power to 15W. The Pixel 6 Pro held that power level until 75 percent charge, then dropped to 12W. Again, the phone held that level until 85 percent charge. From there, the power level gradually fell to as low as 2.5W as the battery approached 100 percent capacity.

All told, Android Authority measured a total charge time of 111 minutes for the Pixel 6 Pro using Google’s 30W charger, with the phone taking 31 minutes to hit 50 percent.

Google’s charging info was misleading, but it wasn’t wrong

Again, Google didn’t claim that the Pixel 6 series supported 30W charging (even though the language used was incredibly misleading). Google said the Pixel 6 phones would charge to 50 percent in 30 minutes. Android Authority validated that.

To be abundantly clear, that doesn’t mean people can’t be upset by the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro charging capabilities. In fact, I’d argue the criticism is justified, especially when you consider that the Pixel 6 Pro takes 121 minutes to fully charge using the old 18W Google charging brick. Springing for the 30W charger only gets you a 10-minute faster charge time. The issue I have is with the claim that Google lied about the Pixel 6 series having 30W charging when the company didn’t actually say that.

Google’s new support post adds additional context to these findings but ultimately reiterates what the company already said: the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro can charge to 50 percent in about 30 minutes and 80 percent in about an hour. The only other notable information is that the Pixel 6 maxes out at 21W and the 6 Pro at 23W of charging. Although Android Authority measured 22W for the 6 Pro, it acknowledges that the 1W difference is within the “margin of error from our testing.”

Finally, the takeaway from this should be that if you have Google’s 18W charger from a previous Pixel (or another similarly-specced charging brick), you really don’t need to get the 30W charger.

Source: Android Authority, Google, (2)

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Google rolling out patch to improve Pixel 6’s fingerprint sensor

Google is rolling out a new patch that should improve the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro‘s fingerprint sensor, but it might not be coming to Canada yet.

Google’s support page notes that the update includes “minor bug fixes and some fingerprint sensor performance improvements for [the] Pixel 6 and 6 Pro.” However, the notes don’t specifically state how the sensor is improved, and they mention that the update is U.S. and Japan only.

Google previously stated that its fingerprint scanner takes a bit longer to authenticate than other devices’ because it uses “enhanced security algorithms” that can “take longer to verify or require more direct contact with the sensor.”

Some The Verge writers seem to have noticed a bit of improvement in fingerprint performance following the update, but according to Dieter Bohn, the publication’s executive editor, it’s still slower than the Galaxy S20’s. For what it’s worth, the update hasn’t arrived on my Pixel 6 Pro yet, which makes sense given I’m in Canada.

I haven’t personally experienced issues with the fingerprint scanner, but the problem does seem to be relatively widespread. We’ve reached out to Google for more information regarding if the update is coming to Canada.

Source: Google Support page Via: The Verge

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Google reportedly ditches its early 2022 foldable Pixel plans

Ross Young, the CEO of Display Supply Chain Consultants (DSCC), has offered several important details regarding Google’s rumoured foldable pixel smartphone.

According to Young’s report, Google won’t launch its rumoured foldable Pixel in the first half of 2022 despite what previous rumours indicate. Young says that his sources state Google believed its foldable isn’t currently as competitive as it needs to be, particularly when compared to Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold and Z Flip series that dominates the North American and European markets.

The Pixel Fold reportedly offers similar sizing and display specs as the Z Fold 3; however, it reportedly lacks an in-display camera. Additionally, Google’s foldable likely won’t feature the Pixel 6′s new and improved camera sensors and utilizes the shooter featured in the Pixel 5, Pixel 4 and Pixel 3 series (yes, Google used the same sensor for three years). That said, it’s worth noting that Samsung’s Z Fold 3 also utilizes a 12-megapixel sensor that isn’t quite as good as what’s available in its flagship S series.

It’s expected that the first Pixel foldable will run Google’s recently announced Android 12L OS. Android 12L is an Android 12 variant designed specifically for larger screens thanks to its more intuitive multi-tasking and other features.

DSCC’s upcoming ‘Quarterly Foldable/Rollable Display Shipment and Technology Report’ should offer more insight into the foldable smartphone technology that could appear over the next year and possibly even Google’s rumoured foldable pixel.

Source: Display Supply Chain Consultants (DSCC)

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Google reportedly ditches its early 2022 foldable Pixel plans

Ross Young, the CEO of Display Supply Chain Consultants (DSCC), has offered several important details regarding Google’s rumoured foldable pixel smartphone.

According to Young’s report, Google won’t launch its rumoured foldable Pixel in the first half of 2022 despite what previous rumours indicate. Young says that his sources state Google believed its foldable isn’t currently as competitive as it needs to be, particularly when compared to Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold and Z Flip series that dominates the North American and European markets.

The Pixel Fold reportedly offers similar sizing and display specs as the Z Fold 3; however, it reportedly lacks an in-display camera. Additionally, Google’s foldable likely won’t feature the Pixel 6′s new and improved camera sensors and utilizes the shooter featured in the Pixel 5, Pixel 4 and Pixel 3 series (yes, Google used the same sensor for three years). That said, it’s worth noting that Samsung’s Z Fold 3 also utilizes a 12-megapixel sensor that isn’t quite as good as what’s available in its flagship S series.

It’s expected that the first Pixel foldable will run Google’s recently announced Android 12L OS. Android 12L is an Android 12 variant designed specifically for larger screens thanks to its more intuitive multi-tasking and other features.

DSCC’s upcoming ‘Quarterly Foldable/Rollable Display Shipment and Technology Report’ should offer more insight into the foldable smartphone technology that could appear over the next year and possibly even Google’s rumoured foldable pixel.

Source: Display Supply Chain Consultants (DSCC)

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Google created a ‘Fortnite Task Force’ after Epic launched game outside the Play Store

Epic Games responded to Google’s countersuit over Fortnite on Android Monday, citing details about the search giant’s ‘Fortnite Task Force’ intended to deter developers from following Epic and launching apps and games outside the Play Store.

As a quick refresher, Epic Games — the company behind the massively popular Fortnite game — sued Google after the company removed Fortnite from the Play Store. The move came after Epic pushed out an update to the game that gave players the option to buy in-game items through Google’s payment system or directly from Epic at a reduced price. Epic also sued Apple for similar reasons. The focus so far has been on whether the app stores offered by Apple and Google are monopolies, with Epic using some more contentious store policies to support the argument.

The Apple trial has been the central stage of conflict between developers and the companies behind some of the largest digital storefronts. Following the verdict in the Epic v. Apple suit — which mostly came down in Apple’s favour, although the judge did require Apple to permit developers to offer alternate payment options — the spotlight has shifted to the Google lawsuit.

Google’s task force used a security issue to deter sideloading Fortnite

In October, Google countersued Epic, claiming the game-maker intentionally breached its developer contract with the Fortnite update that added an alternate payment method. However, in a filing on Monday, Epic responded by highlighting Google’s alleged efforts to control Android app distribution with the ‘Fortnite Task Force.’

Bloomberg reported that Google created the task force in 2018 — as a reminder, Epic originally released Fortnite outside of Google’s Play Store. People who wanted to download the game needed to install it from Epic’s website (in a process known as sideloading) or if they had a Samsung smartphone, could install it through Samsung’s Galaxy Store.

Epic cited internal Google documents in the filing, which alleged that the task force used a potential security problem with Fortnite to put the game in a bad light. When someone finds a security issue, standard practice is to give the developer 90 days to patch the problem before publicizing the details. However, Epic alleges that Google’s task force took the information to “friendlies” in the media within nine days.

Further, Epic accused Google of rushing to get the word out in the filing, saying the company wanted to “deter developers from launching outside of Google Play and maintain Google’s monopoly over Android app distribution.”

Google responded in a statement Monday. The search giant defended its actions, saying it took steps to protect users from the security flaw and doubled down on the accusation that Epic released Fortnite with security vulnerabilities.

However, Epic’s filing also alleged that Google’s software engineers thought the security warnings were overblown. In one email, the head of Android security wrote that the message “really does seem inappropriately dire.”

Task force was one of many alleged efforts to keep the Play Store on top

It’s also worth noting that Google’s ‘Fortnite Task Force’ isn’t far from the only measure the company took to keep apps and games on the Play Store. Previous details from other court filings — including from this same Epic Games case — show Google engaged in several anti-competitive practices. The company allegedly paid off developers to keep their software on the Play Store, created revenue share agreements with Android phone makers that prevented them from installing their own app stores and forced OnePlus to abandon a deal with Epic to pre-install Fortnite on the company’s phones.

Other court documents accuse Google of knowing the Android sideloading process was bad and trying to buy Epic to make the Fortnite problem disappear. Another report suggested Google tried to keep Netflix using its in-app billing system by offering the streaming company a special deal.

All the while, Google has defended itself by pointing to Android’s openness — specifically, the fact that Android allows users to sideload apps from anywhere. But, as court documents have repeatedly demonstrated, Google actively worked against that openness by trying to deter third-party app stores and sideloading.

Source: Bloomberg

Categories
Mobile Syrup

There’s a fix coming for missing Magic Eraser on Pixel 6

Some Pixel 6 users have lost access to ‘Magic Eraser,’ Google Photos’ coolest new feature, after downloading a recent update.

The tool, which lets you remove people from the background of photos, started disappearing on some Pixel 6 users’ devices shortly after the smartphone series’ release. Thankfully, Google is working on a fix, according to Android Central. While the feature vanishing is caused by an early rollout of the Magic Eraser, it’s strange that the update only affected some users.

If you’re Magic Eraser is gone, you can head over to the Google Photos app properties and uninstall updates to make it appear again. Then, head to the Google Photos app on the Play Store and download the correct update.

In other Pixel 6 news, Google also recently released a fix for the Pixel 6 related to Google Assistant randomly calling people in your contacts list.

Source: Android Central