Categories
Mobile Syrup

CCA report suggests Canada’s 50/10 broadband goal is too little, too late

A new report from the Council of Canadian Academies (CCA) suggests that Canada’s goal of connecting every household with 50/10 broadband speeds by 2030 is too little, too late for households in rural areas and on First Nations reserves.

For context, the 50/10 benchmark refers to a promise made by the federal Liberal government in March 2019.

Through the “Universal Broadband Fund,” the government pledged to invest $1.7 billion over 13 years to ensure every Canadian household has access to a broadband internet connection with minimum speeds of 50Mbps for downloads and 10Mbps for uploads.

In this new report titled ‘Waiting to Connect,’ the CCA notes that in 2019, only 45 percent of rural households had access to 50/10 broadband internet speeds, and only 25 percent of households on First Nations reserves (and no households in the territories) met the 50/10 threshold.

In comparison, nearly all — 99 percent — of urban Canadian households already had access to 50/10 broadband speeds.

This regional discrepancy in basic internet access is jarring, considering many carriers are currently in the process of rolling out high-tech 5G networks across the country.

Moreover, the report argues that the 50/10 benchmark is insufficient, suggesting that a better goal would be to ensure that Canada’s internet networks are more reliable and feature “symmetrical or near symmetrical upload/download speeds.”

According to the report, the government’s benchmark also fails to address the “non-technical issues that led to the connectivity gap, the barriers that persist, and the practices and principles that can guide the journey to equitable connectivity.”

Equitable connectivity is presented by the CCA as crucial for Indigenous reconciliation, as “high-quality broadband connectivity in Indigenous communities supports self-determination and Indigenous economic reconciliation by elevating Indigenous participation, innovation, and leadership in the economy.”

However, the report argues that “current approaches to deliver broadband connectivity have left Indigenous communities in Canada at a disproportionate disadvantage” — as indicated by the 25 percent 50/10 access rate mentioned above.

The CCA is a non-profit organization that gathers experts from different fields to publish research studies relevant to public issues in Canada.

You can read the full report, which was commissioned by the National Research Council of Canada, on the Council of Canadian Academies website.

Source: Council of Canadian Academies

Categories
Mobile Syrup

Privacy Commissioner’s office wasn’t consulted on Liberal online harm bill

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) is claiming that the Liberal government never consulted with them when drafting a controversial new internet regulation bill that would require websites to delete harmful content on their platforms.

The National Post reports that according to an OPC spokesperson, the office “was not consulted by Canadian Heritage on this matter,” and was only provided with a briefing on the proposed legislation after explicitly requesting it.

This online harms bill — also known as Bill C-36 — is one of 10 pieces of legislation that Canada’s newly re-elected Liberal government promised to introduce in parliament within the party’s first 100 days back in office.

The bill was first announced in July as a technical paper, though any official parliamentary discussion on it was halted due to the 2021 federal election being called.

The paper proposes the creation of a “Digital Safety Commission” consisting of a digital safety commissioner, digital recourse council, and an advisory board.

The commission’s job would be to require websites — like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube — remove harmful and abusive content from their platforms within 24 hours, or face repercussions.

The proposed legislation identifies five categories of abusive and harmful content: terrorist content, content that incites violence, hate speech, child sexual exploitation content, and the non-consensual distribution of intimate images.

However, the specifics of the bill have many worried that the new commission, while seeking to protect Canadians, would simultaneously violate their privacy and constitutional rights.

As a result number of internet policy and legal advocacy groups have spoken out against the proposed legislation so far, including OpenMedia, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Ranking Digital Rights, the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, and the Citizen Lab.

Source: The National Post