Categories
Cottage Life

Loons are being threatened—this is why and how you can help

As a documentary filmmaker, I’m often telling stories from far-flung places, but last summer I uncovered one in my own backyard—the lake. Our log cabin looks out on the far end of Smoke Lake in Ontario’s Algonquin Provincial Park. It has a massive deck, perfect for watching the seasons change from spring to summer to fall and for soaking in the quiet. Often, our nearest neighbours are the resident loon pair, who seem to appreciate the isolation as much as we do. At night, they call to each other, a haunting sound that somehow embodies the Canadian outdoor experience. By day, in early summer, they parade their chicks on their backs as if showing them off for us. And by late August, those chicks have grown enough to practise liftoff, flapping their wings in preparation for fall migration.

Over the past few summers, I started noticing things were amiss. The calls were less frequent, the chicks harder to spot from my trusty kayak. Had the loons moved elsewhere? Or were they in trouble? The search for answers ended up becoming an hour-long documentary.

One of the first things I learned is that these majestic but mysterious birds are tricky to study; there are big holes in our understanding of where they go and what they do. “They’re a cryptic species,” says Ken Wright, a wildlife biologist and loon researcher in B.C. “They’re beautiful, amazing birds, and yet there is not much known about them.”

Part of the challenge is their elusive nature—as anyone who’s tried to predict where a diving loon might surface can attest. Also their population is widely dispersed, often in remote areas. “Loons don’t nest where there are lots of people, they fly along the ocean where we’re not really looking, and they aren’t hunted so there are no government-led monitoring programs in place,” says Mark Mallory, an Acadian University professor and a Canada Research Chair. It would take countless hours for researchers to mount a population census. Thankfully, scientists have the help of cottagers, who have easy viewing access from their docks, shorelines, canoes, and kayaks.

How can cottagers help scientists?

For more than four decades, Birds Canada has recruited cottagers to collect data for its annual Canadian Lakes Loon Survey. “One of the big advantages is that you can engage so many volunteers, and you have all these folks all over the place,” says Doug Tozer, the director of waterbirds and wetlands at Birds Canada. “You can monitor so many more lakes than you ever could with paid staff.” Over the years, cottagers and other citizen scientists have kept tabs on more than 4,000 lakes. “People volunteer to make observations of loons and, particularly, how many chicks they produce, and they report it back to us,” says Tozer. “We use that to monitor how healthy loon populations are.”

In 2021, their analysis of all of that collected data started to raise alarm bells.

Across almost all of Canada, common loons—the loon species that breeds the farthest south into cottage country—are struggling to reproduce. Adult populations are stable at about 240,000 breeding pairs, but if they cannot raise enough young to replace themselves, the future of the species is at stake. As Wright puts it: “Just because you see loons on your lake doesn’t mean all is well.”

“We’re right on the doorstep of them producing so few chicks that their populations are going to start to decline,” says Tozer, who co-authored the analysis of decades of data with fellow biologist Kristin Bianchini. “We really identify with loons as being part of Canada, and we’re going to almost lose a part of us, I think, if that happens.”

Common loon productivity (measured by how many chicks a loon pair can raise to six weeks of age) has dropped by an average 1.4 per cent per year nationwide over the past three decades and is now hovering just above the rate at which overall population numbers will start to fall. Declines are steepest in Atlantic Canada, but the downward trend persists in every province except—for reasons unknown—Quebec.

“We are really stymied as to what the mechanisms are behind those declines, and that has me worried,” Tozer says. “There are only so many loon researchers in North America. It’s a small group, so we feel a lot of pressure to figure out what’s going on.”

What hardships are loons facing during breeding season?

To understand the hardships facing loon families, our cameras followed the progress of two pairs of loons over the course of a breeding season, one pair in Wisconsin where similar long-term population studies are underway, and one in Algonquin Park. As we rolled (from a safe distance with long lenses), I found myself both impressed and concerned.

Loon parents face so many challenges in raising their young. They are excellent swimmers but move awkwardly on land, so they nest at the water’s edge where they can slip into the lake at the first sign of danger. The location leaves their eggs vulnerable to raccoons, otters, and other shoreline predators. The adults must maintain a gruelling, constant vigilance throughout the four-week incubation period. Nests can be washed out by motor boat wakes or sudden heavy rainfalls that drown the eggs if left unattended. As shorelines are developed, the number of prime nest sites shrinks, and rival intruder loons will sometimes attack, even kill, resident loons to take over a territory.

Once the eggs hatch, the workload only increases. Chicks enter the water within hours and stay on the same lake until they learn to fly in the fall—if they survive that long. Life on the open water leaves them vulnerable to predation from above in the form of birds of prey, so they need around-the-clock parental protection. Unlike adult loons, which are strong enough and have sharp enough beaks to fight off an eagle swooping down for a quick meal, chicks need help to stay alive.

Chicks also require a steady supply of fish to eat, all of it coming from a single lake. The faster they grow, the more likely they are to avoid predation. In the first several weeks, parents must do all the hunting: diving, catching, surfacing, feeding the chicks and themselves, then starting over again. Loon families require lakes with lots of fish and clear enough water to find them; two parents with two chicks can consume up to a half-ton of fish in a single season.

“You watch a loon family out on a lake and it looks really easy right? But there’s a lot that can go wrong if you’re a chick,” Tozer says. “You can starve, you can have inclement weather, you can get separated from your parents by a motorboat and then something eats you.” Since loon parents hatch only one or two young per season, every chick loss is significant.

And yet, common loons have persevered for eons. They are one of the oldest living bird species on earth, dating back 70 million years. Why are they struggling now? The biologists I spoke to, both in Canada and parts of the northern United States where similar declines have been observed, agree that human-induced environmental changes are likely at the root. And that’s what worries them most.

“Common loons winter off our coasts. They summer in our backyards at cottages, so they are very vulnerable to human activity,” says Wright. “They are showing us what the health of our lakes is.”

What are the major inhibitors to common loon reproduction?

It will take years’ more study to know for sure, but researchers have three major concerns about the lake water that loons inhabit. Mercury—a pollutant released from the burning of fossil fuels—is found in many lakes across Canada, and is a neurotoxin that makes loon parents lethargic, less able to care for their young.

Second, acid rain that fell decades ago has killed off fish stocks that have yet to fully rebound in some areas. “Loons need lots of big, nutritious organisms, in the form of fish, to survive. But those are exactly the things that got knocked out of these lakes by acid rain,” says Mark Mallory, who has studied the effects of lake acidification on loons in the Sudbury, Ont. area. Recent research shows that, even after acidity has dropped in some lakes, the loons have not returned. “Nature is very resilient, and it may take a long time for things to decline,” says Mallory. “And correspondingly, it can take a long time for things to recover.”

The third main concern is climate change. To see a nesting loon panting in the heat, beak open and breathing heavily, is heartbreaking. But biologists who study loons believe that the effects are far more insidious: among other outcomes, warming waters cause an increase in methylmercury levels and cause bacteria to be more active. As Tozer says, “Climate change is going to be the big ugly thing in the background that’s causing a lot of this change.”

Loons are especially vulnerable to environmental change because they return to the same lake where they’ve laid eggs in the past, even if conditions are deteriorating. “This is hard-wired into their genetics,” Mallory explains. “They keep trying because they’ve defended the territory and they think everything else looks good about this site.”

The loon pair our cameras followed last summer in Algonquin were able to navigate the breeding season’s many challenges and raise two healthy chicks. Sitting in an edit suite watching the parents brave swarms of blackflies to stay on a nest or delicately manoeuvre their long beaks to carefully rotate an egg was awe-inspiring. To see them underwater, turning on a dime to catch a yellow perch, is to witness them at the peak of their powers. Both chicks grew at an astonishing rate—from tiny fluff balls to juveniles almost the size of their parents. It felt like a victory despite the larger question marks about the survival of the species.

In late fall, long after we close up our cabin each year, the young loons are left to fend for themselves. Their parents migrate first, leaving them alone on the frigid waters for several weeks. They feed and grow, building strength until just before the ice comes in. Then they too take flight, on their maiden journey south, as instinct guides them to do.

I only hope it continues for generations to come. For the loons’ sake and for ours.

Julia Nunes wrote and directed the one-hour feature documentary, Loons: A Cry From the Mist.

Categories
Cottage Life

Biodiversity loss is threatening Canada’s wetlands; here’s why it matters

The swamps of the Minesing Wetlands, a 15,000-acre area about 15 kilometres west of Barrie, Ont., are not the most immediately welcoming of places. Convincing someone to spend a day exploring the thick, forested marshes—with clouds of mosquitoes in the air and bloodsucking leeches in the water—isn’t easy. I should know. I’ve been trying to convince friends to join me on a trip there for years. Again and again, my attempts are met with two questions: why would I visit, and why should I care?

Answering the first question is easy. Despite seeming unappealing, the Minesing Wetlands (sometimes called the “Everglades of the North”), are one of our country’s most significant wetland systems. As a conservation biologist helping to map out some of Canada’s most important places for nature, I’m excited to see some of the dozens of rare and endangered species that still call the Minesing Wetlands home. One species here has piqued my interest above all others—a jewel in this swampy rough. It’s called Hine’s emerald, a large dragonfly with a metallic green body and brilliant emerald eyes.

It’s an incredibly rare species; it requires a very specific type of wetland environment, and—unlike most dragonflies, which go from egg to adult in less than a year—the aquatic larvae of this species take three to five years to grow into adulthood, relying on crawfish burrows for shelter during winter and through any dry spells in summer. The Minesing Wetlands are the only place in Canada where this dragonfly is found, so as a nature lover, the slimmest chance to see this beautiful and unique piece of Canadian biodiversity is more than enough reason to visit.

Answering the second question—why should I care—takes longer to answer. I get asked similar things quite often: why care about this one rare species, no matter how beautiful it is? Why should I care about these wetlands or any other seemingly random place? Ultimately, it comes down to understanding why conservation and nature are important at all. Sure, nature is a nice-to-have, but is it really a must-have?

Why does biodiversity matter?

Most people are aware that across Canada and the world, we’re losing more and more wild biodiversity every year. From looking at around 25,000 Canadian species that scientists have some basic understanding of (a fraction of the estimated 80,000 species in Canada), we know that about one in five species in Canada are imperilled to some degree.

These bits of Canadian biodiversity are significant internationally too. More than 300 species in Canada are found nowhere else in the world. From the adorable Vancouver Island marmot to Algonquin Provincial Park’s Eastern wolf, the planetary survival of these species depends entirely on our conservation decisions here in Canada. When it’s gone here, it’s gone everywhere.

But, sometimes when I talk to landowners and land-users—farmers, cottagers, hunters, and ATV-ers—who hear me say we need to protect species or habitat, they get on the defensive. They don’t want to be told how to use their land, or be limited in what they do on it because of some obscure plant or insect. They want to know what purpose these species serve, and if their function really outweighs the inconvenience, annoyance, or danger that these animals pose to us. They want to know, if it’s gone, does it really matter?

The answer is, yes. Many of the natural processes that humans rely on depend on biodiverse ecosystems. Consider pollination, where a huge variety of wild bees, flies, and other insects—including mosquitoes—play a crucial role in ensuring the growth and yields of the fruits, veggies, and nuts that our diets rely on. Or consider decomposition, where species of ants, termites, mushrooms, worms, and more work together to break down and recycle dead plant and animal matter, clearing the way for new life. Gardeners will be familiar with these decomposers and detritivores as some of the main players in creating compost, but without them in the wild, we would quickly be buried under piles of dead plant and animal material.

Species including rattlesnakes and black widow spiders and plants such as American ginseng might hold the cure to helping treat different diseases and conditions. Even those “annoying” species are fundamental pieces of biodiversity. Throughout their life cycle, mosquitoes help to move nutrients between aquatic and terrestrial systems. They also form a key link between phytoplankton and micro-organisms—favoured prey of filter-feeding aquatic mosquito larvae—and larger animals, from bats to frogs, fish to birds. Mosquitoes are a central component of the food web in wetlands. Losing these pesky critters could compromise the function of the wetland, an ecosystem that helps us by filtering water, acting as a buffer to hold water and prevent destructive flooding during storms and winter thaws, and fighting climate change by removing carbon from the atmosphere. These are ecosystem services that would be massively expensive to replace.

Having a variety of species participating in these functions matters as well. For example, pollination is more effective when done not just by a single species (such as honeybees), but instead by a diverse set of wild pollinators. And more biodiverse ecosystems may also be more resilient to change.

While many species might seem similar on the surface, we still lack so much understanding about the basic biology of most species and the complex interactions that they participate in within ecosystems. It’s rarely clear what effect losing a species might have. To paraphrase biologists Paul and Anne Ehrlich, early pioneers in the fields of conservation biology and environmental advocacy, losing species in an ecosystem is like blindly popping rivets off a plane while it’s flying. Some rivets might be redundant, and the plane can probably keep flying for a short while even with some structurally important rivets removed. But it’s silly to risk popping off any rivets when you don’t need to.

What can we do to help biodiversity?

We have a big (but not impossible) task ahead of us to make sure that we keep all of our rivets on the metaphorical plane (or threads in the tapestry of life, if you prefer a less utilitarian analogy). Preventing further loss and recovering biodiversity to what it was—think of it as restoring rivets that have been damaged on a plane—goes together with addressing the climate crisis. The good news is that nations are taking steps towards this.

Just this past December, 188 countries from across the world agreed to a new global framework for addressing biodiversity loss. While not perfect, the agreement contains some ambitious goals, including protecting 30 per cent of lands and waters by 2030, restoring and stopping the loss of areas important to biodiversity and of high ecological integrity, and addressing key drivers of biodiversity loss. Importantly, this agreement highlights the need for conservation to be led by (or at least happen in collaboration with) Indigenous peoples and local communities—something that is especially important here in Canada.

And it’s not just at the Minesing Wetland. Wherever you are—at the side of a lake, on the banks of a river, on the edge of a field, or deep in the woods—there are many things that you can do to help biodiversity around you. It can start as simple as creating a pollinator garden of native wildflowers (or encouraging the wildflowers that are already growing), setting aside parts of lawn or lands to stay “wild” (such as by leaving leaf litter or wetlands alone for the year), or building and properly maintaining nest boxes for species such as bats or bees.

Or you can participate in community science through apps such as iNaturalist or eBird. Local land trusts, conservation authorities, and nature groups can give you advice on the best actions to protect and steward lands you own and connect you to like-minded networks of people. Conservation doesn’t need to be hard, and doesn’t always need to be opposed to other ways of enjoying lands. By engaging with the conservation network and community around you, you can find new creative ways to take care of the land and appreciate nature.

Ultimately, stopping biodiversity loss requires action at both the local level and globally. As important as it is to protect and steward biodiversity near you, it’s also important to vote for leaders who will take conservation seriously and work to meet global commitments.

I’m looking forward to my trip to the Minesing Wetlands in search of the Hine’s emerald. I’ll keep asking people to risk the marshes and mosquitoes to join me, and along the way, start down the path of appreciating biodiversity in all its forms. Like the gears in a watch, every bit of biodiversity—whether it’s an emerald-eyed dragonfly, or a bloodsucking leech—plays some sort of role in the bigger picture and has intrinsic value of its very own. With hope and hard work—and an appreciation for the importance of all the pieces of our planet—I’m optimistic that creatures like Hine’s emerald and other rare species will be a little less rare by the time I get a chance to see them.

Peter Soroye is the Key Biodiversity Areas assessment and outreach coordinator with Wildlife Conservation Society Canada. As you read this, he’s likely on a hike that’s taking 200 per cent longer than necessary as he stops to photograph every bug, bird, and flower he sees along the way.

Categories
Cottage Life

What’s the deal with competition-themed cottage gatherings?

Why must lakeside gatherings involve chili cook-offs and karaoke contests? What happened to just, you know, gathering?

Q: “I host an annual party at my cottage every Victoria Day weekend—it’s sort of a ‘Welcome Back to the Lake’ kind of thing. My neighbours are encouraging me to give it a competition theme: you know, Best Potluck Dish or Best Costume Based on a TV Character. I feel like that’ll discourage people from attending. What’s the deal with this—isn’t it enough that we all just get together and have a barbecue?”

A: You should consider yourself fortunate to have avoided the irritating “competition entertaining” trend for so long because, like giant hogweed or mindful paddleboard yoga, it’s one of those things that infiltrated Cottage Land some time ago and simply refuses to die. I remember working at the meat counter of our little cottage-country store about 10 years ago and having to help customers who, as part of a cottage weekend invite, had to whip up an entry for a burger competition or a rib cook-off. It was a foreign concept to me at the time. Some guests took the clever approach of buying our house-made patties and passing them off as their own. Others were deadly serious, showing up with oddball Internet recipes that required special ingredients like ground hanger steak, bacon jam, or shiso leaves that would all but guarantee glorious victory at the now-annual Mud Lake Patty Smash. But many customers who weren’t very handy cooks were just stressed out by the whole thing. I had to walk a few through the Burger 101 crash course so they could create a patty that wouldn’t make them the butt of weekend jokes. Burger anxiety? What kind of host-monster would want to put their guests through that?

All fingers point to those pointless reality TV shows where competition gets made out of things that don’t usually require winners and losers in the normal universe. You know, singing, dancing, baking. That sort of thing. It’s no surprise that people are addicted to watching television. That’s part of the human condition. But how our love of gladiatorial entertainment got transmuted into a popular form of cottage entertaining is a mystery to me. Yes, competition has always been part of the cottage scene, from canoe races at the regatta to a fishing derby weekend. But these activities are intrinsically competitive in the first place. That’s the whole point of the exercise. The way I see it, the big difference between the fun competition of a badminton game and the angst-inducing rivalry of a Frozen-themed costume battle or a fish taco smackdown is that in badminton, and most other regular competitions, you measure out winners and losers by keeping score, or timing a race, or weighing a fish. But cottage food competitions must be judged, and like many of the very worst Olympic events—I’m looking right at you, figure skating—rely on a biased and often fraudulent way of awarding medals. That’s why figure skaters are always crying. And there’s no better way to ruin a cottage dinner party than to watch the losers of a Cold Soup Cook-Off hold hands as their tears wash stage makeup into a bowl of artisanal gazpacho.

So, just in case it is not perfectly clear, you are not alone in wondering what’s up with this weird competition theme thing. Yes, it will probably deter a few guests. And yes, it will be a colossal pain in the keister for those folks who play along. But because this is your annual party, you occupy the decision-making high ground. So tell your neighbours, in a nice way, to go pound salt. If they want to host a bake-off or a dress-up theme weekend, that’s their business. Case closed. But your final question distresses me: “Isn’t it enough that we all get together and have a barbecue?” Well, it should be, shouldn’t it? I mean, isn’t the point of getting together at the cottage, whether for a dinner party or a whole weekend, to get together? You know, fellowship, some good chat, maybe a few laughs? Have you noticed how often, in a social setting, people feel they must constantly show you stuff on their phones? Is it because we are collectively losing the power of conversation? Is it possible that a competition theme helps with that by giving us something to talk about?

So maybe you could argue that the structure of competition-type themes makes entertaining easier. Maybe. But I recently heard about a group of cottage couples who do a rotating Chopped theme dinner thing, where the host has to make a meal that includes four random ingredients that the other couples picked. I’m not sure I get it. Was regular socializing too boring for them, but this diabolical arrangement gives them a frisson of culinary excitement? Or was regular entertaining too easy? So they devised a way to stimulate their dopamine receptors by making meal prep exceptionally difficult and prone to epic failure? Here’s a test that tells me these guys are total whack jobs: head to a library, a bookstore, or the Internet and try to find cookbooks with “difficult”, “stressful”, and “time-consuming” in their titles. You will find none. Now perform the same search using “easy”, “fun”, and “delicious” and you will be deluged with suggestions, especially when the books are about entertaining guests.

But who knows? Maybe the times have changed, and the cookbooks haven’t caught up yet. For the record, I am not an enthusiastic cottage host. But if the modern way to entertain guests is to make the process a hardship and a competition, I am ready for the challenge. For starters, why not have guests compete to accomplish something useful, instead of producing six middling variations of Coquilles Saint-Jacques? Like a timed event to see who can split the most firewood in 30 minutes? Or a team contest to see who will reign supreme in cleaning measured sections of eavestrough? The competitive variations—and the potential for entertainment—are almost endless. You could set parents against children in a deck chair stain-off. Or separate married couples and pit them against each other in an inside versus outside window cleaning battle. The best part is that because everyone seems to have gone gaga for cottage theme competitions, your guests will actually thank you for hosting a wonderful weekend after they’ve knocked off all your spring opening chores. It’s enough to make me really embrace the idea of cottage entertaining.

This article was originally published in the March/April 2023 issue of Cottage Life.

Categories
Cottage Life

Wind winging: the affordable, easy-to-pick-up winter sport you have to try

Dan Bartoli is a Canadian superdude. By day, he is a soft-spoken, mild-mannered electrical engineer who works for a global manufacturing conglomerate. From the company’s outpost in a Peterborough, Ont., industrial park, he designs and builds tiny, mundane machines. “We make instruments that measure volume and level using ultrasound,” he tells me. I had no idea such contraptions existed, but apparently, lots of companies need lots and lots of them, and they’re not cheap. The work has kept him busy, endlessly improving his mousetrap for decades. 

But once he clocks out from work, Dan seeks out adventure, attempting feats of derring-do using way cooler gadgets. He is fit and lithe, seemingly without an ounce of body fat, a late-fifties guy with the cut physique of eternal youth. Only the salt-and-pepper hair hints at his years. On this mid-March weekend, we are at his cottage north of Buckhorn, Ont., on the shores of Gold Lake. A snug log cabin hideaway is built atop a massive granite slope, but the little wooden shed down by the lake is where he keeps his gear. 

The day is cold but cloudless, and the lake is blanketed by a thick sheet of ice and a cushion of fresh snow. Dan’s wearing mirrored Ray-Bans to filter the bright sunlight bouncing off the white horizon, nothing but middle-aged chill. He grabs his alpine boots and slips them on, even though there’s no chairlift within an hour’s drive. Then he pulls out his skis, leaving the poles behind, and grabs the mystery gear—a waist-high duffle bag weighing less than seven pounds, along with what looks like a bicycle pump on steroids. 

With pump in hand, skis slung over one shoulder and duffle bag over the other, Dan walks it all out to the middle of the frozen bay. Most guys with gear to show off can’t stop talking about it, but Dan doesn’t say a word. He is not a talker to begin with (a trait common to both mild-mannered men and their alter egos), and his silence heightens the anticipation. He drops the bag onto the ice, unzips it, and reveals his superpowered contraption. It looks like what you might get if you crossed a windsurfer with a hot-air balloon: a mast-less, hand-held triangular kite with an inflatable skeleton. Is it a bird? A parachute? No! It’s…an Armstrong A-Wing with a 5.5 m² surface area. 

Dan blows up the wing’s airframe in two minutes flat with less than 100 pumps. He lays his skis on the ground, snaps his boots into their bindings, holds the wing above his head, and he’s off. It’s not a particularly windy day—not even windy enough to require the harness he sometimes uses—but the wing is so light and manoeuvrable that he can hold it at whatever angle best captures the breeze to propel him forward. He’s doing something I previously thought impossible: downhill skiing without a downhill slope, gliding effortlessly on a bald flat lake. 

Standing beside me out on the ice, Dan’s wife of 34 years, Cindy, gets a chuckle out of my amazement. “You may have noticed he’s a quiet guy,” she says, “but this is what gets him woohooing.” Cindy is the chatty one in the relationship, the artist to his engineer, an amateur photographer and writer. 

They’ve always been active as a couple, but Dan’s the adrenaline junkie. You should see him, she tells me, when there’s some real gusts for him to lean into, when he can slalom, spin, and practically achieve liftoff. “The first time he ever tried it was in the farmer’s field behind our neighbourhood in Peterborough,” she says. “It was very windy, but he got the hang of it fast.” As she was watching him test his wing from their bedroom window, she recalls, a neighbour texted her. “She says, ‘You gotta check this out! There’s this guy out in the field…What is that thing he’s holding? Is he on…skis? What he’s doing is unbelievable!’ She was watching him through her binoculars. She didn’t know it was Dan.” 

Winter cottaging is not for everyone, but as the saying goes, those who like it, like it a lot. Cindy and Dan Bartoli’s cottage isn’t fully winterized; its central heating system is a woodstove, supplemented as necessary by portable electric heaters. But they love it here in winter. Once the fire is roaring and dinner’s in the oven, the open-concept living area cozies up and holds the heat nicely. As a bonus, the leafless winterscape provides an even better view of the bay. 

The property was initially purchased by Cindy’s mother and her aunt, Peggy and Carol Noyes, who, in 1952, snapped up one-and-a-half acres of just-released Crown land with 400 feet of waterfront. The lot cost $143.70, plus a survey fee of $80.50—Cindy still has the receipts. The sale was conditional upon the construction of a private summer cottage within 18 months and valued at no less than $500. Peggy and Carol bought a prefab kit for a 20-by-24 foot structure from Peterborough Lumber and built it with the help of Peggy’s boyfriend, William Wakeford, who promptly purchased the smaller neighbouring lot and built an identical prefab on it six years later. 

Theirs is an iconic Peterborough love story: Peggy worked at Quaker and Bill at General Electric, the city’s two largest employers at the time, and whose massive manufacturing plants still dominate the cityscape (though GE’s beautiful red-brick buildings, built in the late 19th century, are now mostly empty—the company shut down its Peterborough operations in 2018). They met and married at Mark Street United Church in Peterborough’s East City neighbourhood, and had three kids who spent their summers with their cousins at the Gold Lake cottage in the Kawartha highlands. The provincial park of the same name, originally an 18 sq. km postage stamp on the map, was expanded in 2003 to 375 square clicks that now borders their lake. 

Cindy loved exploring that wilderness as a kid—“It was our playground growing up,” she says. Her childhood cottage experience was rustic in the true sense of the word: no running water and an outhouse. “Whenever we complained, my mother would just say, ‘It builds character.’ It became a family punchline.” Stubbed toe? Dunked canoe? Poison ivy rash? Lose big at cards? It builds character. 

Cindy and Dan met as third-year undergrads at Queen’s University in the mid-eighties, at a girls-night-in house party where Dan and his buddies were dressed up and serving dinner for the gals. After they’d been dating a while, she brought him up to Gold Lake for what she called the cottage relationship test: “If he can spend a week with an outhouse and no shower and still wants to come back, he might be a keeper.” (This test is really just another way of saying, “It builds character.”) Dan passed this test with honours; he and Cindy wed in 1988. 

Around that same time, Peggy and Bill engineered a property deal: they traded Bill’s smaller neighbouring cottage to Carol for her share of the original cottage. That deal cleared the way for a rebuild: in 1991, 40 years after it was originally built, Peggy and Bill tore down the prefab and built the current one in its place, with a spacious porch, a hot shower, and four bedrooms surrounding the open-concept living area. And perhaps best of all, the woodstove made it possible to come up in winter.

Cindy and Dan are four-seasons-active people, preferring human-powered activities to motorized ones: canoeing over boating, Nordic skiing over snowmobiling. “But for as long as I’ve known Dan, he’s always had an affinity for wind,” Cindy says. He learned to sailboard as a teenager growing up in Sudbury, Ont., and though he’s been doing windsports his entire life, he still struggles to describe why he loves it. “The engineer in me is fascinated by the physics of it,” he says. “There’s just something about the power in the wind, when you’ve got the harness on and everything is balanced and the wind is pulling you, and you’re just flying along.” No one who sails is ever bored by sailing. Every wind is unique, and using it to power your vessel is always a test of physical and mental acuity. Even when you spill, it’s a great natural high. 

But windsports are almost invariably summer sports. The only exceptions to this rule are kite skiing and ice boating, activities that entail a lot of complicated gear (the ropes on the kite are an ordeal all on their own), technical knowledge, and potential injury. Furthermore, kiting requires a very large body of frozen water, while ice boating requires a very large body of frozen water without any snow on it, which is a tall ask. They’re fussy sports. Neither is the kind of activity most cottagers can do from their waterfront. 

The inflatable wing, though it was built for use on water, is the game-changing winter cottage toy that we’ve all been waiting for. 

Its development was part and parcel of the recent decade-long wave in water sport innovation, including the stand-up paddleboard and the foilboard, which is basically a surfboard with a hydrofoil riveted to its underside, allowing it to rise out of the water when moving at speed. And with each of those inventions, the adrenaline junkies could only watch and wonder: wouldn’t it be cool if that thing had wings? 

The key to the invention of the wing, which didn’t exist until a few years ago, was the inflatable-strut technology that forms its skeleton, which is rigid enough to catch the wind but light enough for any 14-year-old to hold over their head. The first commercial wing was introduced to the market in 2018, and it’s surprisingly affordable for such a new technology: anywhere from $700 to $2,000. 

Their popularity has also been propelled by Covid-19. In fact, it was in the midst of lockdown-enforced web surfing ennui when Dan first discovered them. “We were going to go to Aruba with another couple to learn to kiteboard in the winter of 2020, but that trip fell through,” he recalls. That’s when he found some videos of winter wingers on skis and snowboards. The advantages, he says, were obvious right away. “There’s no way I could kite ski at the cottage because the lake’s not big enough. But I knew the wing could work.” He bought his A-Wing online for $1,300. Shortly thereafter, he was out in the field wowing his neighbours and, soon after that, woohooing on a frozen Gold Lake, just like he is now. 

There’s only one way to end a day of winging on the lake, and that’s in the sauna. (This, by the way, is where I learned how ripped Dan is.) It’s a wood-fueled barrel sauna manufactured in Ontario by Dundalk Leisure Craft. Cindy and Dan bought it in 2018, and thanks to both the sauna and the wing, they spend more of their winter weekends at the cottage than ever before. Dan’s mother was Finnish, so affinity for saunas runs in his blood.

Once Dan gets the sauna fire roaring, he pulls out some more cool gadgets, an auger and a giant saw, to cut a hole in the ice for a cold bath. In keeping with their ethos, they’re 100 per cent human powered, no batteries or ripcords allowed.  Dan’s got the system down: he draws a big triangle on the ice, drills a hole at one point, then saws straight lines between it and the other two points.

After 20 minutes in the dry sauna heat, it’s time for a dip. With total calm, Dan walks out to the triangle and lowers himself into the freezing water. He basks in it for a while before returning to the sauna. Steam rises off him like a slow-simmering human torch. I, on the other hand, a polar-bear-dip novice, can barely keep my composure as my lungs shrivel up in the water, then scamper back to the sauna like a lizard on its hind legs. 

The best thing about winter winging, Dan tells me, is its accessibility. If you can ski or snowboard, you can do it. “You don’t need lessons for winging like you do with kiting,” says Dan. “It’s really easy.” There’s some learning to do when it comes to harnessing the wind—Dan can talk endlessly about optimal angles and wind direction—but you figure out the basics pretty quick. 

And snow is probably a better surface for learning windsports than water. There’s no ducking under a swinging boom; no falling into the lake; no hauling yourself back onto a sailboard; no uprighting a soaked, heavy sail; no falling back in when you can’t find your balance; no deerflies biting your ankles through the entire ordeal. When you’re winter winging, you just tumble onto your kiester in the snowy cushion like you would on the slopes, and then you get back up and keep going.

Cindy is not the type to dote over or worry for her husband, but she definitely recognizes the advantages of his winter hobby. She tells me about the many injuries Dan has sustained while windsporting in summer—wrenched ankles, jammed fingers—but he won’t stop unless he’s bleeding. “Winter winging is safe,” she says, “and it has really opened up the season for him and for us.” There has never been a lower price to pay, in terms of money or risk of injury, for the adrenaline rush of windsports. It’s enough to make anyone feel super.

Want to try winging? Here’s how to get started

Look for smooth, packed snow in an open area such as a lake or field (bigger is better). In softer snow conditions, wider skis or a snowboard will work better.

wind winging gear
Photo by Liam Mogan

Skis: Dan says he bought his skis about 20 years ago for some trips out west and hadn’t used them much in the last several years. “So winging was the perfect reason to dust them off,” he says. “Any set of skis or a snowboard will work for wing skiing.”
Dan’s gear: Skis are Head C10s, and boots are Alpina

Harness: A windsurfing harness and line for the wing will allow you to cruise all afternoon without tiring.
Dan’s waist harness: Dakine

Wing: “There is now a huge selection of wings online,” says Dan. According to Jean-Robert Wilhelmy, co-owner of windshop.ca, before you buy, you should think about whether you’ll be using it in winter and summer, how much wind your area gets, and whether the lake tends to have a lot of waves. Wings are measured by area in square meters in a range of sizes, such as 2 m² at the low end and 7 m² in the upper range. You also need to factor in your weight and experience; as they go up, so can the size of the wing. “To start, you need a beginner-intermediate wing that is quite powerful to get you going, such as the Freewing Go or the Takuma Concept,” says Wilhelmy. He recommends a 4.3 m² to 4.5 m² wing for lighter weight and 5.2 m² to 5.5 m² for medium to heavy. “A wing that’s too big gets very tiring and heavy on the arms, and if it’s too small, it won’t make you move.” He suggests taking lessons at the beginning and starting with a good wind to help you get going fast.
Dan’s wing: Armstrong A-Wing 5.5 m²

This story was originally published as “The Wing King” in the Winter 2022 issue of Cottage Life. 

Your genetics influence how resilient you are to cold temperatures, says new research

Layer up! We vouch for this clothing that will protect you against the worst of winter

Categories
Cottage Life

Put together a killer cheeseboard for less than $50

Overwhelmed at the cheese counter? Don’t overthink it. Ace Cheeseboard 101 with a few simple tips: hit our must-have categories, shop your pantry for nibbles, and pair with anything bubbly (beer and cider included). Try different textures, flavours, and milk types. And, obey the golden rule: take the cheese out of the fridge (still wrapped) 30 to 60 minutes before serving, so it comes to room temperature to bring out its full flavour.

The 4 types of cheese you need

Brie-style

Start approachable but decadent. Melt-in-the mouth creaminess and nuanced flavours are traits of brie-style cheeses (think soft texture and a white “bloomy” rind). They pair wonderfully with prosecco or Champagne. Look for a French Brie de Meaux, a decadent triple cream like Délice de Bourgogne, or a soft goat’s milk-style like Ashley Goat (Ontario).

On our board: Albert’s Leap, Christina Camembert (Ontario), is a local version of the French classic. It has a silky smooth texture and gentle, sweet milk notes with a hint of tang.

Washed-rind

A monastic-style cheese (traditionally made by monks, dating to the middle ages) with a rind washed with brine (or beer or spirits) as it ripens. Soft (like the one shown here) or firm (like an Oka). Expect strong “barny” aromas, along with a full, rich, savoury taste bomb that’s perfect with beer. The copper-orange rind is a dead giveaway, and if you think you taste bacon flavours, you’re not wrong! Think Reblochon, Munster, Taleggio, and, in Canada, Quebec’s Le Mont-Jacob, Baluchon, or L’Adoray.

On our board: L’Adoray (Quebec) is an unforgettable cow’s milk cheese wrapped in spruce bark. Serve as above, or, if very ripe, slice off the top, and spoon this gorgeous, oozy party animal onto baguette.

The blues

Love blue? Park it here. People expect blues to be overpowering, but some blend salt, sweet, and buttery notes with a gentle kick. Try a Gorgonzola Dolce, or Bleu d’Auvergne if you’re feeling timid.

On our board: Bleu D’Elizabeth (Quebec) Fromagerie Presbytere is creamy, sweet, punchy, and salty—heaven with a drizzle of honey.

Aged and bold

This is the cheese that draws kids and adults alike, aged to develop complex flavours and a long, delicious finish. This firmer style is hardy, travels well for a picnic, and holds up over a couple hours when entertaining. Try a tangy two-year-old cheddar, a wedge of sweet-salty Asiago, a nutty Gruyère, an earthy cloth-bound cheddar, or an aged sheep-milk style (with caramel notes and crunchy crystals) like Tania Toscana (Ontario).

On our board: Cows Creamery Appletree Smoked Cheddar (P.E.I.) is a two-year-old cheddar, which spends eight hours in applewood smoke creating a tangy, smoky, creamy bite of YUM.

Shopping cheat sheet

Shopping cheat sheet 3–4 cheeses is the ideal amount. For an appetizer board, aim for 35-50 g of each cheese per person. (About 150- 200 g per wedge for 4.) Keep your cheese habit indulgent but affordable by sharing your budget with the cheesemonger. (Three cheeses at $10 per makes a winning platter). You DO NOT need to know all about cheese, that’s what the cheesemonger is for. Just describe what you like! “I’m really into Babybels” is a fine place to start. It is totally normal to ask to taste the cheese. Do it. The more you taste, the more you’re able to describe why you love what you love. These are just guidelines, if you desire three types of triple cream and a glass of Champagne—go for it!

Categories
Cottage Life

How to dress warmer for winter using what you already have

There’s a ton of new technology in winter wear, but don’t empty your closet—a lot of what you own is fine—as long as it’s the right material and you wear it correctly.

Kenora dinner jacket: Not all are created equal, so check what yours is made from. Wool or synthetic— keep it. Cotton—only wear it when you’re missing the cottage.

Grandma’s wool sweater: Great for snuggling, but not ideal as an insulating layer compared to new designs that have softer wools and sleeker cuts. Anything wool helps keep you warm, though.

Cotton: When damp, it sucks the heat from you. Wear wool (non-itchy merino is best) or synthetic as a base when you may break a sweat or get wet.

Jeans: Fine for casual wear, but not for outdoor activewear. Made of dense, heavy cotton weaves, they rob you of heat and feel uncomfortable when wet.

Rubber boots with felt liners: Nothing works better for slush, but try adding a footbed with more insulation, support, and comfort. Wear a lace-up winter boot for active sports or long-distance walks.

Multiple pairs of socks: Three or four pairs means you’ve got the wrong-sized boot or are cutting off circulation to your toes. The warmest combo is a thin wicking sock topped with a thicker one for warmth.

Yoga pants: If made from synthetics, they’re a good base layer. With snow pants or a shell, they’ll keep you warm when you’re playing in the snow.

Decode your tags

Manufacturers love coining high-tech labels for these four essentials:

  • Wicking: Moving moisture vapour and sweat off your skin will keep you warmer. Next to skin, wool (especially non-scratchy merino) and synthetics work equally well. Avoid cotton.
  • Warm: Down, fleece, and synthetic insulation trap heat close to your body. Electric jackets supply heat to keep you warm. All work, but no one choice is perfect. Down is packable, but is expensive and no good if it gets wet. Synthetics, including fleece, stay warm when wet, but can be bulky. And electric is heavy and pricey, and batteries run out.
  • Waterproof and breathable: Fabric that keeps out the wind and the wet while also breathing makes for a warmer, drier you. Wind is easy to block. For waterproofing, look for a “water column” rating of 10,000 mm (the height of a one-inch-wide column of water when the fabric at the base leaked in a test), or more. For staying dry, especially when active, breathability is equally important. How fast water vapour moves from the inside to the outside of a jacket determines how wet you feel. There’s no one rating system for breathability, but here are two tips: the more waterproof, the less breathable; and in waterproof gear, the more breathable, the pricier it is.
  • Fit: For effective layering, clothes should fit like Russian nesting dolls, each layer looser than the last.

Categories
Cottage Life

Understanding the psychology behind our fear of snakes and loss

Some of our cottage fears are easy to see. Others sneak up on you.

MAY 2020

Most of the cottages on the bay are still shuttered.

The dock in front of the log cabin that we are hoping to buy is floating, disconnected from the shore to protect it from winter’s crushing ice.

Dennis, our real estate agent, pilots the barge to the dock where Karl, the cabin’s owner, is waiting to greet us. We throw him a line, but the boat drifts away and pulls Karl with it. Now he is hanging off the side of the barge, feet dangling. His rubber boots fill with water before we can hoist him up. “Never hold on, that’s the first rule of boats,” says Dennis. “It’s important to know when to let go.”

After the inspection, he hands me a stack of purchase papers. “Sign them when you are ready.”

Dennis’s wife is waiting for us at the marina. She has been in town, stockpiling groceries for their island home. We are in the midst of the first COVID-19 lockdown, and everyone is striving to be an island now. We exchange a few words from a careful distance, wearing masks.

“Rubber boots,” she says, as they walk away. “Get your kids rubber boots. You can’t be too careful with rattlesnakes.”

Snake season: Why the snakes are out right now

JUNE 2020

I turn the key. The boat’s motor starts right away, but my heart is revving faster than the engine.

For the first time in my life, I’m in the driver’s seat of a boat. Proof of my new pleasure craft licence is printed and folded and carefully stowed in the Princecraft’s glove compartment. A recurring question on the tests concerned maximum load and carrying capacity. I am quite sure we have exceeded ours. I can barely see over the bow, which is piled with furniture and groceries and cleaning supplies.

What I remember most from that boat trip, from the day we took possession of our little log cabin on Georgian Bay, on the edge of the world’s largest freshwater archipelago: my heart banging at my ribs so hard I can barely breathe and a burning sensation in my right hand as I grip the gear shift. The bow tipped up, and the stern dragged down. My eldest daughter, Emma, next to me, trying to calm me. My husband, Anton, and our younger daughter, Rowan, paddling next to us in the yellow Kipawa canoe that my father gave me for my 21st birthday, more than two decades ago. Anton and Rowan arrive at our new dock at the same time we do, I am driving that slowly. This fear—the force of it, the sheer physicality of it—takes me by surprise.

I have spent my life in boats. Scuba diving off protected reefs and further out on the high seas where poachers gunned across international waters. Gunwale bobbing on Lake Simcoe, at my childhood cottage; canoeing northern lakes and rivers. Anton and I once wrapped a canoe around a rock in fast water, hundreds of kilometres from any human settlement in the Northwest Territories. We spent five hours and all of our energy pulling the canoe off the rock with a system of carabiners and ropes.

And yet. In all those adventures, I never took the stern. I did not know how to paddle a J-stroke, the stroke used to steer a canoe and keep it following a straight line.

This was odd because my father, Francis, with whom I was particularly close, was an expert paddler. He could bring a canoe to shore in any weather, silently and precisely. He helped map the official portage routes for Killarney Provincial Park, where he knew all the old logging trails. Canoes often turned up in the documentary films that my father and his twin brother made about Ontario and the North.

Cottage Q&A: Dog is bitten by a rattlesnake

APRIL 2020

We are only weeks into the first coronavirus lockdown. No March Break travelling, no Passover gathering, no Easter egg hunting. It is dark and cold, and there is nowhere to go. It seems strange, dangerous even, to be anywhere but home. And anyway, it is the middle of the night.

The fluorescent lights sting my eyes as I step through the unlocked door. I have been standing outside the veterinary emergency entrance for what seems like hours, watching bleary-eyed staff come and go, arriving by bicycle, taking smoke breaks, picking up lonely paper bags—Uber Eats—sitting on the pavement. I am wearing a mask; a woman asks me to put on a face shield and blue gloves too. Everyone would rather I was not here, but they understand why I have come inside.

I kneel down on the cold, hard floor next to our dog, Muddy.

The staff have wrapped him in blankets. Oxygen blows at his snout, but his breathing is laboured. He has a mysterious respiratory illness that will not respond to antibiotics. I pat the top of his head, the softest, smoothest patch of black fur. It still feels puppy-ish though he is in his middle age like me. Also puppy-ish: the way his muscles have relaxed because of the hydromorphine. As if he is slowly turning into a puddle on the floor, softening at the edges. The veterinarian primes the syringe. There will be two injections: one to block all feeling, another to stop his heart. I whisper and cluck and cradle him. All this touch, all these sounds saying one thing: I am with you, here. You are not alone.

I have birthed two children and watched them awaken to the world, but I have never held a body as awareness left it.

I walk out of the clinic and toss the gloves and face shield into a garbage can. I am glad I insisted on being there. For Muddy’s sake and my own. For nearly 50 years I’ve been holding on, afraid to let go.

Wild Profile: Meet the milk snake

JULY 2020

There are two paths up to the new cabin: the exercise path and the nature path. The first one climbs steeply across open rock. The second meanders through a forest of pine and hemlock and cedar and oak and poplar and maple and birch.

I am walking down the nature path, inhaling the heart-opening scent of pine, listening to the west wind sough through the needled branches, when my body stops. I spin around and start walking the other way before my mind can process what the rest of me already knows: there is a large snake curled in the middle of the path, shaking its keratin rattle. I nearly crash into Anton, who is walking behind me. “Rattlesnake,” I squawk. Anton looks at me in disbelief.

“Well, we did buy a cottage on the edge of Massasauga Provincial Park,” I say, my heart still drumming. “I think we’re going to have to learn how to live with them.” Massasauga means “mouth of the river” in Ojibwe; it’s also the name for Ontario’s only venomous snake. Early in his career, Anton worked in the emergency room in Parry Sound; he remembers the summer they ran out of antivenin.

There is perhaps no human fear more common or visceral than the fear of snakes. For years, scientists have debated whether or not it is innate.

In 1992, a behavioural ecologist named Lynne Isbell was running through a glade in Kenya. She stopped in front of a cobra before she could process why she had stopped. Isbell spent the next two decades trying to understand what had happened. She hypothesized that evolution has favoured primates with good vision to detect snakes; those living with poisonous snakes tend to have better vision. Lemurs in Madagascar, on the other hand, have terrible eyesight: there are no poisonous snakes on the island.

Neuroscientists in Japan and Brazil found brain-based evidence to support Isbell’s theory by studying the pulvinar, a cluster of neurons that may help us recognize potential threats and direct our attention. Macaques that had never encountered snakes responded quickly and frequently to images of snakes—more quickly, even, than when they looked at faces. They seemed hardwired to detect them.

Fear, it seems, helps us see things. Quickly, clearly.

And yet. Only two deaths by rattlesnake have been recorded in the history of Ontario. Massasaugas have far more reason to fear people: settlers killed thousands as they moved into their habitat and latticed the province with wider and busier roads.

Persecution has been widespread. Even the staff at nearby Killbear Provincial Park routinely killed the snakes when the park first opened in the 1960s; there were so many of them. The habitat is ideal. Killbear snakes can find good hibernation and gestation sites within a few hundred metres, a tenth of the distance they might have to travel elsewhere.

In the 1970s, staff stopped killing snakes: conservation-minded scientists argued that the park should be protecting all species, not just the cutest and the fuzziest. Instead of taking a shovel to snake heads, park employees would now move rattlesnakes away from campsites. Only later did biologists realize that this strategy was nearly as fatal.

Rattlesnakes, like most snakes, have a strong fidelity to the first hibernation spot they choose. Once they’ve chosen a site and survived the first winter, they will return to the same spot for the winters following. If you move them too far, they keep looking for their old place. They will freeze to death instead of finding a new place to settle in.

✺ ✺ ✺

In the first half of my life, there were two things I feared most: losing my father and losing Romany Wood, my family’s summer property. Really they amounted to the same thing. I could not imagine who I was without my father, my family history, and the storied place I’d grown up in.

One hundred years ago, my architect grandfather designed and built three cottages on the south shore of Lake Simcoe. The cottages looked like something out of a Tudor fairy tale: half-timbered and stuccoed white with lead-paned windows. Each had its own name. The tidiest and smallest was called The Bears after the Goldilocks tale; the grandest, with a moth-eaten tapestry, moose antlers in the great hall, and a large bell at the peak of its roof, was called Pendragon after the castle built by King Arthur’s father. Outside, a massive oak tree grew up from an acorn my grandmother had planted.

When you come to really know a place, you see time moving through it in subtle changes of growth and decay. There I had watched moss and ferns colonize old tree stumps over decades and meadows grow into forest. I knew where to find the remains of the old sugar shack hidden among the maples, which trees had housed honeybees before they swarmed or died off, and which diseased apple trees still yielded sweet fruit.

My father felt this deep connection to the land as well. He said he didn’t need a flashlight to walk the winding paths through the dark woods at night. His feet knew the way.

Growing up, I imagined that we’d lived on the shores of Lake Simcoe forever. There were six generations of Chapmans planted at a neighbouring church that overlooked the lake. But the tree roots challenged my fantasies of permanence: they pushed up the oldest Chapman gravestones and made them list to one side.

My fear of losing our place on Lake Simcoe sharpened when my father was forced to sell our home in the city, where four generations of family had lived. Trying to hold onto it nearly bankrupted him. Even at 13, I knew he regarded letting go as a failure, and I internalized this feeling.

✺ ✺ ✺

My father was older and had a full life as a filmmaker before settling down to have a family at 44. There were stories of him exploring the north shore of Superior, of crash landings in the Arctic. He and his twin, Christopher, had sailed on the Bluenose II’s maiden voyage, documenting a search for lost treasure on Cocos Island off Costa Rica. In the 1950s, he’d driven from England to the Congo Basin with an anthropologist to record the lives of Ituri Forest people. He recalled walking through the dark jungle and suddenly finding a small hand in his, guiding him through the night.

The last vestige of that adventurous life—before marriage, before children—were the canoe trips he ventured on each spring and fall that he continued to take into his 70s.

The older I got, the stranger it seemed that he had never taught me to paddle, nor taken me with him on a camping trip. Something in my father must have thought it was strange too. Out of the blue, he gave me a canoe for my 21st birthday.

The J-stroke is not so difficult to master: you pull your paddle towards you and then turn the blade outward to “correct” the stroke—to prevent the nose of your boat veering to one side. I could have easily asked a friend to teach me or tried to learn it myself. But I was too embarrassed to admit that I needed instruction. I was also afraid—afraid to move forward, afraid to take the helm.

In my 20s, I invited myself on an early spring canoe trip with my father and his 60-something cronies. I came home with stories about how the wind shifted and drove the ice against our campsite’s shore. How we paddled anyway, through ice that looked uniform and thick but broke magically into hexagon candles that bobbed out of the way when we pulled our blades through them.

But I did not like to admit that this man I idolized, this expert canoeist and wildlife documentary filmmaker, had not taught me how to stern.

✺ ✺ ✺

In 2017, the Chapman family sold a third of Romany Wood. My father fell that same night. He hit the corner of a bookshelf on his way down. It punctured his lung and he developed pneumonia. He very nearly died.

“Do you know why you’re in the hospital?” a nurse asked in the loud, nasal voice people reserve for foreigners and old people deemed unable to understand them.

“I had a fight with a piece of furniture,” he replied dryly, even when he was in the midst of his most terrifying hallucinations. “And the furniture won.”

My father had developed Parkinson’s. The doctors said it was why he lost his balance. People with Parkinson’s lose their proprioception—the ability to sense the place they are in, where their body is located in space. The neurological disease progressed more quickly after he fell and kept him in the hospital for nearly three years. At first, he suffered terrible hallucinations. He imagined himself on a narrow ledge, about to fall. He was sure that the curtains at the end of the hospital bed were the floor—as if his bed had been set vertical and was about to pitch him forward.

He had lost his sense of place in the world. It did not seem coincidental that he had lost it so completely on the closing night of the sale.

✺ ✺ ✺

My father held on. Two years after his fall he was still lying in hospital, now unable to regulate his blood pressure. He would faint if he sat up or tried to stand. The rest of Romany Wood was sold. I told myself I was finally ready to let it go. There were too many memories, too much history weighing me down.

Then COVID hit. My father’s hospital was locked down. No visitors would be allowed for the foreseeable future. Now I was losing my father too.

My fears shifted and became more concrete. I was not so much afraid of my father dying now. Instead, I was afraid I would not be with him.

When he first arrived in hospital, in the days when he was constantly lost in fear and hallucination, I’d held his hands for hours. We were on the narrow ledge together, I’d say, squeezing his stiff, taloned hands. Now we are stepping down to safety. When he stared in terror at the curtains hanging at the end of his bed, imagining them to be the floor, I’d ask him to feel the cool sheets at his back and the railings on either side.

It felt good to be able to do this, to allay his fears. I began to realize I had always wanted to protect him. If not from death itself, then from the many fears that are the dress rehearsal for it.

✺ ✺ ✺

When Anton and I decided to buy the little cabin on Georgian Bay, I thought I would be ecstatic. Here was a sweet, tidy, well-kept log cabin in the landscape I loved best in the world: a landscape shaped by ice and west wind, where the pine trees grew in strange and beautiful ways in response to the harsh conditions of their environment. My father also loved the Shield. Although he had held onto Romany Wood with a quiet fierceness and tenacity that seemed out of keeping with his ungrasping nature, he often expressed a wish to have a little cabin somewhere wilder.

A cottage, he said, should only be a launching pad for exploring the world. Nothing more.

Instead of celebrating, I burst into tears: I knew how much my father would have loved the place. As closing day loomed, I found myself in an almost constant state of panic. I had a vivid feeling that I was being strangled. I began pulling at my crew neck T-shirts constantly. Eventually I switched to wearing buttoned shirts. I could not stand to have anything near my neck.

15 surprising facts about Canada’s snakes

AUGUST 2020

My father’s unit is still closed to all visitors but one: an essential caregiver, who, in this instance, is my mother. So we do video calls twice a week instead. I walk him through the forest at our little cabin, pointing out the different trees. “Are there birches?” he’d ask, thinking wistfully of spring canoe trips, before the trees leafed out, when the branches had a soft purple hue. “Yes,” I’d say, walking over to a little stand to show him. Together, we looked at the wildflowers that seemed to grow everywhere and examined a baby snake in the garden.

I told him we’d named the first rattlesnake we saw Herbert, to make it seem less scary. Since then, we’d heard snakes buzzing under our deck and found another one curled up by the bunkie. We were getting used to the idea of living with them. After all, this place had been their home first. We were the trespassers.

My father and I often talked about how everything was interconnected, a subject that fascinated him, and one that took on a more personal meaning as he moved closer to his own end. As his body got weaker, he said, he felt like he was opening to the universe. It was harder and harder to imagine the boundaries between him and the rest of the world. He felt they were dissolving, and he was being absorbed back into the system he had always been a part of.

Before the pandemic, we had a long conversation about ecology, which translates literally from the Greek as the study of home. “The problem with thinking about the environment as something separate from us,” said my father slowly, his blue eyes now half-hooded, “is in trying to determine what surrounds what. It’s a problem of where you draw the boundaries.”

This observation kept repeating in my head after COVID hit. We were all trying desperately to draw boundaries around ourselves and around others to keep each other safe. I thought of it, too, each time I encountered a rattlesnake. If you’re going to live next to nature, you’ve got to take the whole thing, a biologist once told me. Nature can be scary and dangerous, but it’s beautiful too.

“You have a responsibility to be a steward to all the creatures that live there,” says Jonathon Choquette, a biologist who leads a rattlesnake recovery program for Wildlife Preservation Canada. Building fences is useful sometimes—to protect the snakes from the dangers of crossing roads and from the people who feared them turning up in their suburban gardens—but fences can only do so much. Too many can lead to fragmentation of habitat, turning smaller and smaller snake populations into islands of genetic homogeneity. There’s something in nature, as Robert Frost remarked, “that doesn’t love a wall, that wants it down.”

In Killbear, staff had solved this problem by building ecopassages—openings in the snake-fencing—that tunnel under the road and let light and warmth in, facilitating safer snake crossings from one marooned habitat to another. ››

A few days before my father contracted pneumonia again, I went to visit Killbear. I wanted to see how a small town—4,000 visitors are typical on a summer day—manages to co-exist peacefully in perfect rattlesnake habitat with only four kilometres of fencing and four ecopassages to direct snake traffic.

On one of the walking paths, staff had set up pylons to direct foot traffic across the open rock barrens: there were gestating females and dozens of juvenile rattlers on the other side of them. Campers walked blithely past. A few stopped and asked if we’d seen any snakes. Kenton Otterbein, the chief park naturalist, answered vaguely.

Rattlesnakes are the “ginseng” of the snake world.

You never knew who might be a poacher. I knelt down to look at a baby rattler, curled up next to a stick. Its siblings had all moved on.

“It’s fully loaded,” said Otterbein, warning me not to get too close, “but 25 per cent of the time it’s a dry bite anyway.”

I picked my way even more slowly and carefully through the landscape after that, seeing things I would not otherwise see—the various textures in the sphagnum moss, the occasional tiny green leaf turned bright red by a virus of its own. Crevices in the tabled rock where a snake might hide.

✺ ✺ ✺

During our next call, I tell my father about the trip to Killbear and about the two little pines down by our property’s shore. The two pines stand side by side, close enough to interlock their branches, but far enough apart to keep pace with each other and grow out. The way the branches intertwined reminded me of the black and white pictures I’d seen of my father and his twin as children. In so many of them, one of them has his arm around the other in an easy embrace. As adults, the two brothers were less demonstrative, but they always mirrored each other in their body language. When my father and uncle were standing down by the water, it was impossible for me to tell them apart.

I’d also discovered an island called “Francis” and another called “Georgina”—our old township on Lake Simcoe. I wanted him to know that I was not going to let go of him or our family’s past.

SEPTEMBER 2020

My father can barely breathe. This time, he chooses comfort over treatment. I am finally allowed to visit. This time the hallucinations are no longer shot through with fear. But this time his speech is garbled; the Parkinson’s makes him difficult to understand.

At first his inability to communicate is frustrating. Then it is irrelevant. It is only important to be there, and to feel each other’s presence.

I talk and sing and read him poetry.

I squeeze and rub his stiff hands and listen for the gaps between his breaths. The palliative care doctor says he might not last the night.

But he does. The gaps grow longer with each passing night. Now he stops breathing when I stop singing. He starts breathing again when I resume singing. I hold his hand tightly but tell him it is the season for letting go. The trees will soon lose their leaves. I remind him of the two pines down by the water. I tell him I have nicknamed them “The Twins.” He squeezes my hand. Shortly after, he stops breathing altogether.

✺ ✺ ✺

To survive the winter, a Massasauga must choose its hibernation site carefully. Enough snow must fall to insulate the hibernacula and keep the groundwater from freezing. There must be an air pocket so the snake can breathe.

Rattlesnakes used to survive best by returning to the same place each winter, but overwintering is becoming harder. Snowfalls and the cycle of freezing and thawing are less predictable, more extreme. A site that ensures survival one year may no longer guarantee survival the next.

As a documentary filmmaker and writer, it was my father’s job to collect stories and build an archive. To preserve. He was a rescuer—of broken things and people, of stories that would otherwise disappear. But you can’t hold onto everything. What was in him, what drove him to hold onto Romany Wood when it was no longer a reasonable option?

In spring, I scatter some of my father’s ashes, and his brother’s too, and wait for the snakes to emerge from their winter homes. The more time I spend with the Massasaugas, the less afraid I am. They rattle their keratin tails politely if I come too close and remind me to pay closer attention to my surroundings. They remind me there are no walls between us. This is what makes us so vulnerable, but also more connected—to each other and to the place we choose to land.

Sasha Chapman is a Toronto writer and avid paddler.

This essay was originally published as “A snake in the grass” in the Aug/Sept 2021 issue of Cottage Life.

Featured video

Categories
Potins

Playboy to stop nudity

Hugh Hefner has decided to stop publishing full-frontal nudity in Playboy magazine.

The 89-year-old media mogul’s legendary adult publication – which has printed raunchy pictures of the likes of Marilyn Monroe and Pamela Anderson since its inception 62 years ago – will make a number of changes from March 2016, with the biggest being the move to make provocative pictures of women rated PG-13.

Bosses on the magazine have made the change because of the popularity of online pornography.

Chief executive Scott Flanders explained to the New York Times newspaper: ”That battle has been fought and won.

”You’re now one click away from every sex act imaginable for free. And so it’s just passé at this juncture.”

The magazine hasn’t yet decided whether to continue publishing their famous centrefolds, but other confirmed changes include a ”sex-positive female” sex columnist, while the target audience will be young employed males.

Mr. Flanders said: ”The difference between us and Vice is that we’re going after the guy with a job.”

In August, the Playboy website was given a makeover and made safe to read at work, resulting in younger readers and an increase in web traffic.

Chief content officer of the magazine, Cory Jones, said the redesigned magazine would be more accessible and more intimate.

However, he admitted: ”Twelve-year-old me is very disappointed in current me. But it’s the right thing to do.”

Playboy went public in 1971, but was taken private again in 2011 by Hefner and investment firm Rivzi Traverse Management.

The firm owns around 60 per cent, while the publication’s founder owns 30 per cent and the remaining shares are held by Playboy management.

Categories
Potins

Demi Lovato proud of ‘hot body’

Demi Lovato is proud of her ”hot body”.

The 23-year-old singer battled an eating disorder in the past but says she has finally overcome her issues and wants to inspire others.

Speaking on BBC Radio 1’s Live Lounge with Clara Amfo, she said: ”Now I have worked on myself and I look hot, so I am going to work it.

”I’m going to show the world that you can go from having an eating disorder and hating your body to wearing underwear on the cover of a magazine and love it. It’s possible and that’s what I want to show people. I’m owning it.”

Demi – who is preparing to release her fifth album ‘Confident’ – also revealed that she will always share her personal life with her fans but is ready to move on from her past.

She said: ”It’s a little too late to turn back from sharing and pouring my heart out to the whole world

”There are emotional songs on my new album but for the most part it’s a new chapter and I’m tired of my past defining who I am and my brand. This album is not just about what I’ve been through, it’s more soulful and sexier.”

Categories
Potins

Anna Kendrick avoids men who mock

Anna Kendrick avoids guys who try and make her feel ”uncomfortable”.

The ‘Into The Woods’ star is currently single and hasn’t been in a committed relationship since she split from director Edgar Wright in early 2013.

Anna doesn’t have a list of specific traits she wants in a guy but she does know what qualities she doesn’t want in a boyfriend.

Speaking in the February issue of FASHION magazine, she said: ”The wrong kind of guy to fall in love with is the guy who will let go of the steering wheel as a joke. A guy who finds it amusing to make you uncomfortable – which is more common that you’d think – is someone you want to avoid.”

The 29-year-old actress’ parents divorced when she was 15, but she insists she learnt a valuable lesson from their relationship and separation.

She revealed: ”They taught me that staying together for the kids is the wrong approach. It perpetuates this warped idea of what a healthy relationship looks like.”

In ‘Into The Woods’, Anna’s fairytale character Cinderella is left heartbroken after her Prince husband – played by Chris Pine – cheats on her, and it was this premise that attracted the actress to the role.

She said: ”The idea that Cinderella gets cheated on by her prince is the most twisted and genius concept.”

Anna’s cover of FASHION magazine – for which she was shot by Max Abadian and styled by Zeina Esmail – is out in print and as a digital copy on January 12.