Categories
Cottage Life

Ontario government proposes fines for overtaking snowplows on highways

Passing a slow-moving snowplow may cost you, if the Ontario government passes its newest bill.

On April 3, the provincial government introduced its Less Red Tape, Stronger Economy Act 2023. The bill includes 42 initiatives that, if passed, are intended to improve public services, grow businesses, and save people time.

One of the proposed initiatives is an amendment to the Highway Traffic Act. The amendment would make it an offence to overtake working snowplows in a diagonal formation on a multi-lane highway with a posted speed limit of 80 km/h or higher. The fine for passing would be between $150 and $1,000.

“The proposed amendments are intended to reduce unsafe passing maneuvers and collisions occurring by motorists overtaking snowplows performing winter maintenance activities on these roadways. Fewer collisions with snowplows will result in improved safety for snowplow operators and the travelling public, fewer snowplows being placed out of service, and less impact on snow clearing activities on these highways,” the province said in a statement.

Drivers would only be allowed to pass the snowplow if a full lane was available to complete the maneuver. This means that if plows are working in each lane of the highway, you can’t maneuver into an oncoming lane to get around them. In fact, the government says that passing a working snowplow even if a lane is available can be dangerous.

Visibility around the snowplow is often reduced due to blowing snow and the snow ridge created by the plow. And while most plows discharge snow to the right, there are some vehicles that discharge to the left, blocking passing lanes. Plus, it’s likely the road ahead hasn’t been cleared.

Instead, it’s recommended that you wait until plows have cleared your route before hitting the road. But if you do get stuck behind one, stay approximately 10 car lengths back and be patient.  The plow may pull over and let you pass.

The provincial government is asking the public to weigh in on the snow plow amendment before the new act is voted on. You can leave a comment here until May 18.

Feature Video


Categories
Cottage Life

Non-Resident Speculation Tax increase deters Americans looking to cottage in Ontario

The cost of purchasing property in Ontario has become steeper for non-residents. On October 25, the provincial government increased the Non-Resident Speculation Tax (NRST) from 20 per cent to 25 per cent. This is the second tax bump to the NRST in the last year.

The NRST applies to foreign nationals, meaning someone who isn’t a Canadian citizen or a permanent resident in the country and is purchasing or acquiring residential property in Ontario. It’s a one-time tax applied at the time of sale. The government estimates that the tax will generate $175 million this year.

The government introduced the tax in April 2017 to deter foreign buyers from purchasing rental properties and driving up housing prices. At the time, the government set the tax at 15 per cent, limiting it to the Greater Golden Horseshoe Area, which stretches throughout southern Ontario, covering Niagara Falls, Toronto, Barrie, and Peterborough.

In March 2022, the tax increased to 20 per cent and expanded provincewide. The government claimed the increase was part of its pledge to fight Ontario’s housing crises, prioritizing Canadian families and homebuyers.

The October NRST bump to 25 per cent shows that the government feels foreign buyers are still a contributing factor to the province’s housing crises.

“We are working to end Ontario’s housing supply crisis—both by building 1.5 million new homes over the next 10 years, and by ensuring Ontarians are able to access our existing housing supply,” said Steve Clark, the province’s Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, in a statement.

The NRST increase accompanies a series of federal government initiatives aimed at improving housing affordability, including a two-year ban on foreign investment in Canadian housing, starting January 1, 2023.

The prime target of these initiatives is foreign buyers snapping up investment properties in urban centres, but Americans looking to buy a cottage are also being caught in the crosshairs.

Sara West, a realtor in Pointe au Baril, north of Parry Sound, says that the area has a strong American cottager contingent, but real estate interest from the south has been waning in recent years. “There was a fair amount of interest until there was the pandemic, so [Americans] couldn’t come,” West says. “And then there’s the tax. I’ve heard from a few American people saying, ‘I can’t buy’.”

Attracting Americans to the area stimulates the local economy, West says. American cottagers stay for long periods of time, they use local contractors and make purchases in the town’s stores. Introducing barriers will impact that.

The two-year ban on foreign investment is also confusing the issue. West was recently working with an American couple, one of whom is a Canadian citizen, to find a cottage in the area. When she started looking into the two-year ban and how it would affect the cottage purchase, she couldn’t find any information. “We called lawyers and they couldn’t tell us,” she says.

The details of the ban have yet to be published, so it’s unclear whether it will apply to cottage properties. The Finance Department did not respond to Cottage Life’s questions about what the ban will cover.

This doesn’t mean Pointe au Baril is immune to Ontario’s affordability crisis, though. West says property prices skyrocketed during the pandemic. But that wasn’t driven by American buyers, and she doesn’t think deterring them will bring prices down. It’ll just hurt local businesses, she says.

Terry Rees, executive director of the Federation of Ontario Cottagers’ Associations (FOCA), points out that it’s not just potential American buyers being targeted, it’s also Americans who’ve owned cottages in Canada for generations.

Starting January 1, 2022, the federal government introduced the Underused Housing Tax. This is an annual, one-per-cent tax on residential properties owned by non-Canadians that are occupied for less than six months a year. Three-season cottages that aren’t winterized are exempt, but Rees says that if an American owns a four-season cottage, it’s likely they’ll have to pay the tax.

“These are our friends and neighbours,” Rees says. “It’s been [FOCA’s] contention with the feds that taxation on these people has unintended consequences because it’s a penalty that really doesn’t address housing shortages or affordability.”

Americans buying cottages in Canada represent such a small segment of the real estate market that increasing their taxes likely won’t free up housing for Canadians or cause prices to ease in urban centres, Rees says. It’ll just hurt the cottage communities that Americans are a part of or want to become a part of.

“In the north, people count on [cottagers],” he says. “There’s a lot of Americans all over the province owning waterfront property, and most people are part of the community. I don’t think that the intent should be to dissuade people from investing in our rural communities.”

Categories
Cottage Life

Muskoka in talks with Ontario gov. about rejoining Northern Ontario

Eighteen years ago, the provincial government removed the District Municipality of Muskoka from Northern Ontario. Today, the community is looking for avenues to rejoin.

During the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) conference in Ottawa this past August, delegates from Muskoka, which includes the towns of Bracebridge, Gravenhurst, Huntsville, and others, presented Ontario’s Minister of Northern Development, Greg Rickford, with reasons why the community should rejoin Northern Ontario.

“I was pleased by the response we received,” says John Klinck, Muskoka’s district chair. “Of course, it’s a bad time right now with the municipal election cycle upon us, and the provincial government has its hands full in so many other areas, but it’s just something that, collectively, the mayors of Muskoka and their councils and our community believe should be addressed.”

In 2004, under Premier Dalton McGuinty, the provincial government removed Muskoka’s Northern Ontario designation in the Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation Act and the Northern Services Board Act, limiting the community’s government funding.

“Because of the fiscal challenges left by the previous government, our government had to make some difficult decisions,” said Rick Bartolucci, Ontario’s previous Minister of Northern Development and Mines, in a statement released at the time of the decision. “We need to ensure resources earmarked for northern communities are in fact directed accordingly, rather than areas outside of what is traditionally known to be Northern Ontario.”

Klinck, however, says the decision was motivated by petty politics. “The minister at the time was based in Sudbury, and he got it in his mind that if he removed Muskoka, there would be more money available for communities in the north,” he says. “What [the provincial government] really needs to do is recognize—as it claims to be doing—that northern/rural communities, be they in the north or in the south, need some help.”

The provincial government transferred Muskoka from Northern Ontario to Southern Ontario without consulting officials in the area, Klinck says. “It was just a line item sort of buried in a budget.” By stripping Muskoka of its designation, the area lost access to the Northern Ontario Heritage Fund, a provincial government corporation that helps stimulate economic growth in northern communities by providing financial assistance.

Instead, Muskoka has spent the last 18 years competing for funding in Southern Ontario among major urban centres, including Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Windsor, and others.

“There’s this perception of Muskoka as the land of the rich and famous,” Klinck says. That may be true of some seasonal residents, he adds, but Muskoka’s permanent residents struggle.

Klinck points out that Muskoka’s economy tends to be seasonal, catering to cottagers and tourists in the summer. “A lot of folks just don’t have work in the winter,” he says. The area’s population also has a disproportionate number of citizens over the age of 65 (28 per cent), compared to the rest of the province (18 per cent), putting an added strain on Muskoka’s healthcare system.

And real estate prices in the area have skyrocketed in the last two years, making it difficult for permanent residents to buy homes. This year, the median price of a non-waterfront property in Muskoka was $790,000, versus $337,000 in 2018, according to the district.

“We’re really having a tough time,” Klinck says.

Surprisingly, the pandemic applied a temporary salve to Muskoka’s woes, drawing young people to the area. “If they have decent internet, they can work from anywhere. And that provides another measure of disposable income that moves its way through a community,” Klinck says.

But as borders reopen and more jobs move back to in-person work, it will be difficult for Muskoka to retain these new citizens. By rejoining Northern Ontario, Muskoka would gain access to additional funding, allowing it to attract more business opportunities, and keep young people in the area.

Under the federal government, Muskoka is considered part of Northern Ontario. As a result, it receives funding from the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario (FedNor), the federal government’s financial assistance agency for northern communities.

“It doesn’t make sense to me,” Klinck says of the discrepancy between the two levels of government. What’s even stranger, he points out, is that when the provincial government stripped Muskoka of its designation, it split the district’s political riding. The area’s MPP represents both Parry Sound and Muskoka. But Parry Sound is still considered part of Northern Ontario, while everywhere below is considered Southern Ontario. “It puts our local MPP…in a very awkward position,” Klinck says. “I mean, one-third of their constituents have more opportunities than the other two-thirds.”

There’s been no word from the Ministry of Northern Development about Muskoka’s status, but Klinck says he hopes the current government will let them rejoin.

From his perspective, Muskoka’s always been a part of Northern Ontario. “As soon as you drive up Hwy. 400 from Toronto, or you cross the Muskoka line from Simcoe County, and suddenly everything changes. The granite outcroppings pop up, there are beautiful tree canopies, and a proliferation of lakes and streams,” he says. “But on the social side, Muskoka suffers.”

The Ministry of Northern Development did not respond to comment on Muskoka’s chances of rejoining Northern Ontario.