En mai, Crave enrichit son catalogue avec une série de nouveautés qui couvrent autant la fiction que le documentaire, le sport et le cinéma. Entre retours attendus, adaptations, compétitions et histoires vraies, la programmation du mois met de l’avant des productions variées qui explorent des univers très différents. Des enquêtes policières aux parcours humains inspirants, en passant par des films et des séries cultes revisitées, cette sélection propose un aperçu des titres à découvrir tout au long du mois.
ScreenshotEileenThe Last Captains (Saison 2)Bon Cop, Bad CopFacebook : piège pour meurtrierDétective vétérinaireRuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars (Saison 11)Le sous-sol : disparition à Apple ValleyÀ la rencontre de l’Amérique, avec Jason MomoaLa mémoire d’un tueurDécore ta vie, 25 ansScreenshot
UNITED STATES - APRIL 30: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth testifies during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Defense Department's budget request on Thursday, April 30, 2026. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
On April 29, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth was made to testify in front of Congress regarding the US’s costly War on Iran. Since the US’s initial attacks on February 28, more than 6,000 people have been killed by the conflict, with more than 95 per cent of the fatalities in Iran and Lebanon. The deadly conflict started without congressional approval, with Donald Trump claiming the attacks are ‘military operations’ and that the US is not currently at war with Iran, and has now cost US taxpayers more than $25 billion. Donald Trump has proposed a massive increase in military spending for 2027, increasing the country’s total from 2025 by more than 40 per cent. Trump aims to spend $1.5 trillion on his military in 2027.
Congressional hearing
The hearing on April 29 was the first time Hegseth had been forced to testify in front of Congress regarding the Iran War. Hegseth has reportedly been dodging the hearing with the aid of Donald Trump’s influence. The hearing was mostly focused on Trump’s military spending plans, with the Republican congresspeople present expressing their support for Trump’s War on Iran. The Democrats, however, grilled Hegseth on the cost of the Iran War, both in regard to financial cost and the depletion of military resources. Hegseth was also asked about the Iranian elementary school that was bombed on the first day of the conflict, killing 120 children and 26 teachers, all of whom were women. It was quickly discovered that a US Tomahawk missile was responsible for the bombing.
Hegseth eats his own words
If one thing was clear during the exhaustive six-hour hearing, it’s that Pete Hegseth was woefully unprepared. Hegseth has continually demonstrated his emotionality when pressed, and it was on full display during the hearing. Hegseth lost his cool dozens of times, raising his voice at lawmakers and throwing insults at Democrats seemingly every other sentence. Unfortunately for Hegseth, when emotion takes over, poise leaves.
Getty Images
New Hampshire Rep. Maggie Goodlander was one of the most effective Democratic critics in the room, asking Hegseth multiple questions that he fumbled. After Hegseth had bragged about his ‘crack economic team’ earlier in the hearing, Goodlander tested him, asking whether he knew the average cost of gas on February 28. Hegseth (who clearly did not know the answer) replied snarkily: ‘If you lived in California, it was 8 bucks’ (this is not true; the average price of gas in California was $4.44 at that point). Goodlander ignored Hegseth, stating the national average was $2.83. She then asked him if he knew the average gas price today, to which Hegseth made another crack at California prices. Goodlander smirked and told him the price of gas on April 29 ($4.23).
Mr. Hegseth, you said you’ve got a crack economic team that’s looking at the impact of this war on the American taxpayer, and you can’t answer this basic question – that should shock the conscience of every American.
At the end of her time, New Hampshire Rep. Maggie Goodlander asked Hegseth whether he agrees with the statement “the military won’t follow unlawful orders.” Hegseth immediately showed his annoyance with the question, snapping, “I do but understand what you’re insinuating at a partisan point.” Goodlander replied with a smile and revealed that she was actually quoting Hegseth, not a Democrat talking point. Luckily for Hegseth, her time was over after the question. Goodlander took to X to criticize Hegseth after the hearing.
Today’s hearing confirmed what we all know to be true: Pete Hegseth has no business serving as our Secretary of Defense. pic.twitter.com/bCciLiwxek
The newly named ‘Secretary of War’ was asked to justify the existence of the Iran war by Democratic Rep. Adam Smith, the committee’s ranking Democrat. With his questioning coming later in the hearing, he had assembled a list of Hegseth’s statements over the last few hours to quiz him on. Smith began with the nuclear question.
“We had to start this war, you just said 60 days ago, because the nuclear weapon was an imminent threat. [Today] you’re saying that it was completely obliterated? »
Getty Images
Hegseth responded that apparently Iran has ‘not yet’ given up their nuclear ambitions, and that the country still has thousands of missiles, even after 60 days of war. Smith smiled to himself and responded, “So [this war] left us at exactly the same place we were before. »
Hegseth doubled down on the idea of ‘ambition’. Claiming that all of Iran’s facilities have been destroyed, but their ambition hasn’t. There is no precedent for starting a war to ‘kill a country’s ambition’.
Rep. John Garamendi of California also took Hegseth to task, accusing him of misleading the American public. He called the war a ‘geopolitical calamity, a ‘strategic blunder,’ and a ‘self-inflicted wound to America.’
“Secretary Hegseth, you have been lying to the American public about this war from day one, and so has the president.”
-Rep. John Garamendi
Hegseth replied in the most dramatic fashion possible, asking Garamendi Who are you cheering for? Your hatred for President Trump blinds you [to the war’s success]”.
Hegseth asked about military firings
Secretary Hegseth was also asked about the revolving door of military officials since his appointment in January. Since Pete Hegseth took over the newly named ‘Ministry of War’, more than a dozen senior military officials have either been fired or forced to retire from their positions. The list includes Randy George: Army Chief of Staff, Jeffrey Kruse: Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, John C. Phelan: Secretary of the Navy, David M. Hodne: Commander, Army Futures/Training Command, William Green Jr: Chief of Chaplains. All of these senior officials were forced out of their roles by Hegseth, resulting in a serious restructuring of military leadership. Hegseth claimed the personnel changes were made to build a ‘warrior culture’ at the Pentagon. Republican Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina defended Hegseth, claiming he should fire ‘anyone who gets in his way’.
While Hegseth’s comments didn’t shed a whole lot of light on the US military’s decision-making, they did confirm two things. Pete Hegseth is emotional and quick to anger, and he will never be able to respond to criticism with poise and respect. This is your Secretary of War, folks.
UNITED STATES - APRIL 6: President Donald Trump mimics firing a gun during a news conference in the White House briefing room about the war in Iran on Monday, April 6, 2026. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Donald Trump is not a particularly mature President. Baseball caps, cheesy slogans, weird meme-tapes about the military, and strange AI photos have all defined Trump’s second term. None of which are particularly ‘presidential’. Donald Trump is clearly fascinated with the power of visual AI generation, giving him the ability to circulate his image without having to rely on photos that show his declining health and rapid aging. Trump will release an AI video of just about anything, whether it be bombs in Iran, Trump riding a lion, or Trump dropping loads of human feces onto New York City protesters from a fighter jet (yes, all three of those are real photos and videos posted either by The White House X account or Trump’s own Truth Social account).
Trump responds to Iran
This particular post, while not the most egregious, is certainly immature and unpresidential. Trump’s rhetoric surrounding this war has been aggressive and disrespectful from the start, claiming he would ‘send Iran back to the stone age’, claiming ‘a population will be eliminated’, and calling Iran ‘the loser of the Middle East’. Trump also released a profanity-laden message on social media early in April, stating ‘Open the F***in’ Strait, you crazy ba***rds, or you’ll be living in H*ll – JUST WATCH!” Compared to some of those examples, his post on April 29th is tame, but in its simplicity, it seems even more threatening.
Instead of using all-caps like normal, Trump’s message comes off cold and detached. “Iran can’t get their act together. They don’t know how to sign a non-nuclear deal. They better get smart soon.” The photo underneath the posts pictures Trump wearing Ray-Ban-style glasses and holding an assault rifle. Behind Trump are the burning ruins of what is implied to be Iran, specifically appearing as military outposts in the desert.
CaptureTruthSocialRealDonaldTrump
Reasons for the post
With the post coming just a day after Donald Trump publicly rejected Iran’s latest ceasefire proposal, it’s a safe bet that the post is in direct response to Iran’s proposal. Trump reportedly rejected a ceasefire proposal from Iran on April 28th, claiming it was unacceptable. Iran’s proposal failed to include plans to end its nuclear programme until the war has reached a final conclusion. But Trump wants the nuclear programme to be dismantled now, not later. In a post on Truth Social, Trump revealed some of the contents of Iran’s message, and his message was impressively positive. Trump claimed that Iran informed him they are in a ‘state of collapse’ and that they want the US to open the Strait of Hormuz as Iran finds a new leader.
Getty Images
According to Reuters, the proposal carried by Iran to Islamabad over the weekend envisioned talks in stages, not a blanket agreement like Trump wanted. A first stage would require an end to the war, including guarantees that the US cannot restart it afterwards. Negotiators would then resolve the U.S. Navy’s blockade of Iran’s trade by sea and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran aims to reopen under its control. Only then will Iran be willing to look into negotiations regarding other items, including its nuclear programme. A potential disarming of the programme could look similar to the 2015 nuclear deal between the US and other global powers.
“Iran can’t get their act together. They don’t know how to sign a non-nuclear deal. They better get smart soon.”
-U.S. President, Donald Trump on Truth Social
With Trump’s post clarifying that “They don’t know how to sign a non-nuclear deal,” it seems clear that Trump’s post is in direct response to Iran’s ceasefire proposal. What remains to be seen is how Iran will respond. New leader Mojtaba Khamenei is another hardline conservative like his father, and his cabinet is now filled with other hardline believers. The US and Israel have killed most of Iran’s leadership, but in doing so, they unintentionally replaced moderate leaders with hardline war supporters. Experts theorize that Iran’s leadership regime is now more hardline than it was on February 28 when the war started. With Iran pushing for ceasefire talks without agreeing to nuclear disarmament, talks continue to stall.
War on Iran
On February 28, 2026, the US government and Israel undertook a joint operation in Iran, with the US subsequently declaring it was at war with the country. The attacks triggered retaliatory strikes from Iran, targeting US and Israeli military bases across the Middle East. According to Donald Trump, there is no timeline for this war, and the US will continue its operations in the country until it sees a significant regime change, as well as an end to Iran’s supposed nuclear program.
US and Israeli strikes killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, on Day One of the war, completing Trump’s supposed goal. Khamenei has been using deadly violence against civilian protesters in Tehran, and his killing has been the only positive piece of Donald Trump’s illegal intervention. Donald Trump changed his reasoning for attacking Iran after Khamenei’s death, instead claiming he attacked Iran because he had certain information that Iran was going to attack Israel and the United States. Israel calls the strategy ‘forward defence’. Now, after 51 days of war, both Iran and the US continue to posture and are engaging in a standoff surrounding the Strait of Hormuz. Donald Trump needs to alleviate pressure on oil markets in order to further commit financially to the War, and Iran is trying to balance its own exports while putting pressure on the West. The result has been overwhelmingly negative for all civilians involved.
Amazon is making a major move in the growing space economy with a multibillion-dollar acquisition aimed at reshaping global connectivity. By striking a $11.6 billion deal to buy Globalstar, the company is accelerating its ambitions in low Earth orbit satellite technology and positioning itself as a direct challenger to SpaceX. The agreement highlights the increasing importance of satellite networks in delivering internet and communication services worldwide, particularly in remote areas. As competition intensifies, Amazon’s push into direct-to-device connectivity signals a broader shift toward a future where global communication relies less on traditional infrastructure and more on space-based systems.
De nos jours, la mode peut sembler anodin vue de loin, et c’est précisément pour cette raison que l’on a tendance à la sous-estimer. Cela dit, les vêtements ont depuis longtemps été étroitement liés aux notions de contrôle, de respectabilité, de liberté et à la question de savoir qui a le droit d’être pris au sérieux. Pour les femmes, ces règles ont souvent été particulièrement strictes, des corsets et robes de cour aux tailleurs de bureau et uniformes politiques. Parfois, le message était subtil, comme un col ou une palette de couleurs. D’autres fois, il était aussi direct que le port d’un pantalon dans une pièce où celui-ci n’était pas le bienvenu. Les femmes ci-dessous comprenaient que ce qu’elles portaient pouvait changer la façon dont elles étaient perçues, même lorsque le monde était déterminé à les mal interpréter.
OpenAI et son PDG, Sam Altman, font l’objet d’une action en justice concernant le rôle présumé de ChatGPT dans la fusillade de l’école de Tumbler Ridge, qualifiée de fusillade scolaire la plus meurtrière du Canada. Selon la plainte déposée, cette attaque a été perpétrée par une jeune femme de 18 ans qui a tué huit personnes et en a blessé des dizaines d’autres.
Les enquêteurs ont par la suite découvert qu’elle avait eu de longues conversations avec ChatGPT au cours des mois précédant l’attaque, notamment des discussions répétées portant sur des scénarios liés à la violence par arme à feu. La plainte affirme que ces échanges ont contribué à ses actes, alléguant que ChatGPT « a renforcé la fixation violente de la tireuse et l’a poussée » vers l’attaque, décrivant le dénouement comme « le résultat prévisible d’un choix de conception fait par OpenAI pour permettre à ChatGPT d’échanger avec les utilisateurs sur la violence en premier lieu ».
Selon la plainte, des inquiétudes internes avaient été soulevées au sein d’OpenAI avant l’attaque concernant la nature des conversations de l’utilisatrice. La plainte allègue que plusieurs employés ont recommandé de contacter les forces de l’ordre canadiennes après avoir examiné les échanges, qui auraient inclus des références détaillées et récurrentes à des scénarios violents.
Cependant, ces recommandations ont été rejetées par la direction de l’entreprise. La plainte affirme que les dirigeants ont estimé que les conversations n’atteignaient pas le seuil d’un « risque crédible et imminent » de préjudice physique, une norme souvent utilisée pour évaluer si une intervention est nécessaire. Cette décision interne est désormais au cœur de l’affaire, les plaignants faisant valoir qu’une action plus précoce aurait pu empêcher l’attaque.
Getty Images
Cette affaire a attiré l’attention sur la manière dont les systèmes d’intelligence artificielle gèrent les interactions sensibles ou potentiellement dangereuses avec les utilisateurs.
La plainte soutient que la conception de ChatGPT lui a permis de continuer à interagir avec l’utilisateur malgré des références répétées à la violence, soulevant des questions sur les mesures de protection et les systèmes de surveillance.
Elle allègue que les réponses du chatbot ont contribué à renforcer des idées dangereuses plutôt qu’à les interrompre ou à les rediriger. Les plaignants soutiennent que ce schéma d’interaction a joué un rôle dans l’escalade de la situation, présentant la technologie non pas comme un outil passif, mais comme un facteur actif dans les événements qui ont conduit à la fusillade.
Les arguments juridiques portent sur la responsabilité, la prévisibilité et les obligations des entreprises technologiques face à des contenus à haut risque.
« Je suis profondément désolé que nous n’ayons pas alerté les forces de l’ordre au sujet du compte qui a été banni en juin. »
– Sam Altman, PDG d’OpenAI
OpenAI n’a pas détaillé publiquement sa défense dans cette affaire, mais le procès met fortement l’accent sur les processus internes et la prise de décision. La plainte suggère que l’entreprise avait la possibilité d’intervenir ou de signaler ses inquiétudes, mais a choisi de ne pas agir en se basant sur ses critères internes d’évaluation des risques. Cet aspect de l’affaire devrait être examiné de près par le tribunal, notamment en ce qui concerne la manière dont les entreprises définissent et appliquent les seuils de signalement des menaces potentielles. L’issue de cette affaire pourrait avoir des implications plus larges pour le secteur technologique, d’autant plus que les outils d’intelligence artificielle sont de plus en plus utilisés et impliqués dans des interactions humaines complexes.
Getty Images
Au lendemain de l’attaque, Sam Altman a publié une lettre ouverte adressée à la communauté de Tumbler Ridge, dans laquelle il reconnaît la tragédie et exprime ses regrets. Dans cette lettre, Altman écrit : « La douleur que votre communauté a endurée est inimaginable. J’ai souvent pensé à vous ces derniers mois. » Il a également déclaré : « Je tiens à exprimer mes plus sincères condoléances à l’ensemble de la communauté. Personne ne devrait jamais avoir à endurer une tragédie comme celle-ci. Je ne peux imaginer pire chose au monde que de perdre un enfant. Mes pensées vont aux victimes, à leurs familles, à tous les membres de la communauté et à la province de Colombie-Britannique. » Cette lettre constituait la première réponse officielle de la direction de l’entreprise à la suite du procès et de l’attention publique suscitée par cette affaire.
« La douleur que votre communauté a endurée est inimaginable. J’ai souvent pensé à vous ces derniers mois. »
– Sam Altman, PDG d’OpenAI
Altman a également abordé la gestion interne de la situation par l’entreprise, écrivant :
« Je suis profondément désolé que nous n’ayons pas alerté les forces de l’ordre au sujet du compte qui a été banni en juin. »
Il a ajouté :
« Même si je sais que les mots ne suffiront jamais, je crois qu’une excuse est nécessaire pour reconnaître le préjudice et la perte irréversible que votre communauté a subis. »
En conclusion, il a déclaré :
« Je réaffirme l’engagement que j’ai pris auprès du maire et du premier ministre de trouver des moyens d’empêcher que de telles tragédies ne se reproduisent à l’avenir. À l’avenir, nous continuerons à nous concentrer sur la collaboration avec tous les niveaux de gouvernement pour veiller à ce que cela ne se reproduise plus jamais. »
La lettre se termine par sa signature, marquant une reconnaissance officielle des événements et de la réponse de l’entreprise.
A newly surfaced account is once again drawing attention to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s unusual history with dead animals, adding another striking episode to a pattern that has followed him for years. Detailed in a recent biography, the story describes a roadside stop during a family car ride that quickly turned into a moment his own words now place under intense scrutiny. With his children waiting in the vehicle, Kennedy allegedly engaged in a disturbing act involving a roadkill raccoon, reinforcing a series of past incidents that continue to blur the line between curiosity, habit, and controversy.
OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman are facing a lawsuit over ChatGPT’s alleged role in the Tumbler Ridge school shooting, described as the deadliest school shooting in Canada. The attack involved an 18-year-old woman who killed eight people and wounded dozens, according to the legal filing. Investigators later found that she had engaged in extensive conversations with ChatGPT in the months leading up to the attack, including repeated discussions involving scenarios surrounding gun violence. The lawsuit claims these exchanges contributed to her actions, alleging that ChatGPT «deepened the Shooter’s violent fixation and pushed» the woman «toward the attack», describing the outcome as «the predictable result of a design choice OpenAI made to let ChatGPT engage with users about violence in the first place.»
According to the complaint, internal concerns were raised within OpenAI prior to the attack regarding the nature of the user’s conversations. The lawsuit alleges that multiple employees recommended contacting Canadian law enforcement after reviewing the exchanges, which reportedly included detailed and recurring references to violent scenarios. However, those recommendations were overruled by company leadership. The filing claims executives determined that the conversations did not meet the threshold of «‘credible and imminent’ risk of physical harm», a standard often used to assess whether intervention is required. This internal decision is now central to the legal case, with plaintiffs arguing that earlier action could have prevented the attack.
Getty Images
The case has drawn attention to how artificial intelligence systems handle sensitive or potentially harmful user interactions. The lawsuit argues that ChatGPT’s design allowed it to continue engaging with the user despite repeated references to violence, raising questions about safeguards and monitoring systems. It alleges that the chatbot’s responses contributed to reinforcing harmful ideas rather than interrupting or redirecting them. The plaintiffs maintain that this interaction pattern played a role in escalating the situation, framing the technology not as a passive tool but as an active factor in the lead-up to the shooting. The legal arguments focus on responsibility, foreseeability, and the obligations of technology companies when dealing with high-risk content.
«I am deeply sorry that we did not alert law enforcement to the account that was banned in June.»
-CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman
OpenAI has not publicly detailed its defense in the case, but the lawsuit places significant emphasis on internal processes and decision-making. The claim suggests that the company had opportunities to intervene or escalate concerns but chose not to act based on its internal risk assessment criteria. This aspect of the case is expected to be closely examined in court, particularly regarding how companies define and apply thresholds for reporting potential threats. The outcome may have broader implications for the tech industry, especially as artificial intelligence tools become more widely used and increasingly involved in complex human interactions.
Getty Images
In the aftermath of the attack, Sam Altman issued a public letter addressed to the community of Tumbler Ridge, acknowledging the tragedy and expressing regret. In the letter, Altman wrote: «The pain your community has endured is unimaginable. I have been thinking of you often over the past few months.» He also stated: «I want to express my deepest condolences to the entire community. No one should ever have to endure a tragedy like this. I cannot imagine anything worse in this world than losing a child. My heart remains with the victims, their families, all members of the community, and the province of British Columbia.» The letter marked the first formal response from the company’s leadership following the lawsuit and the public attention surrounding the case.
«The pain your community has endured is unimaginable. I have been thinking of you often over the past few months.»
-CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman
Altman also addressed the company’s internal handling of the situation, writing: «I am deeply sorry that we did not alert law enforcement to the account that was banned in June.» He added that «While I know words can never be enough, I believe an apology is necessary to recognize the harm and irreversible loss your community has suffered.» In closing, he stated: «I reaffirm the commitment I made to the Mayor and the Premier to find ways to prevent tragedies like this in the future. Going forward, our focus will continue to be on working with all levels of government to help ensure something like this never happens again.» The letter concludes with his signature, marking a formal acknowledgment of the events and the company’s response.
Pour éviter que votre teint ne paraisse terne, irrégulier, voire fatigué, vous devez choisir judicieusement les couleurs que vous portez. Pour toutes celles et ceux qui ont un teint aux nuances froides, il y a certaines couleurs à éviter et d’autres que vous devriez privilégier. Il est important de savoir si les nuances rosées, glacées ou aux reflets précieux vous mettent le plus en valeur afin de pouvoir composer les plus beaux looks !
